TSTP Solution File: SYN470-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN470-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:33:25 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP24531/SYN/SYN470-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 84] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 168] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1092] [nf = 42] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4728] [nf = 462] [nu = 42] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8364] [nf = 882] [nu = 84] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12094] [nf = 1366] [nu = 126] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15824] [nf = 1850] [nu = 168] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19613] [nf = 2386] [nu = 210] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 23402] [nf = 2922] [nu = 252] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27191] [nf = 3458] [nu = 294] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 30980] [nf = 3994] [nu = 336] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 34769] [nf = 4530] [nu = 378] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 38558] [nf = 5066] [nu = 420] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 42347] [nf = 5602] [nu = 462] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 46136] [nf = 6138] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 49925] [nf = 6674] [nu = 546] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 53714] [nf = 7210] [nu = 588] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 57503] [nf = 7746] [nu = 630] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 61292] [nf = 8282] [nu = 672] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 65081] [nf = 8818] [nu = 714] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 68870] [nf = 9354] [nu = 756] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 72659] [nf = 9890] [nu = 798] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 76448] [nf = 10426] [nu = 840] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 80237] [nf = 10962] [nu = 882] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 84026] [nf = 11498] [nu = 924] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 87815] [nf = 12034] [nu = 966] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 91604] [nf = 12570] [nu = 1008] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 95393] [nf = 13106] [nu = 1050] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 99182] [nf = 13642] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 99182] [nf = 13642] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 99266] [nf = 13642] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 99350] [nf = 13642] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 100274] [nf = 13684] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 105734] [nf = 14153] [nu = 1134] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 185103] [nf = 18468] [nu = 1176] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 957269] [nf = 74286] [nu = 1218] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 18
% secs [nr = 3231216] [nf = 325904] [nu = 1260] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 130 secs [nr = 16100124] [nf = 2020255] [nu = 1302] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 42783386
% resolvents: 38073379 factors: 4710007
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1338
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1338 [2] = 19596 [3] = 164436 [4] = 999065 [5] = 7053253 [6] = 17395488
% [7] = 14114526 [8] = 2954138 [9] = 81546
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp31 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [33] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 211145367
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1897146436
% Number of successful unifications: 42783386
% Number of unification failures: 68596205
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1976840711
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2350623781
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 83
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 103
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 111379591
% ConstructUnitClause() = 84
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 142611
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------