TSTP Solution File: SYN462-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN462-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:28:34 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20371/SYN/SYN462-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 120] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 240] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1560] [nf = 60] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6742] [nf = 660] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11924] [nf = 1260] [nu = 120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 17165] [nf = 1900] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 22406] [nf = 2540] [nu = 240] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27720] [nf = 3244] [nu = 300] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 33034] [nf = 3948] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 38348] [nf = 4652] [nu = 420] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43662] [nf = 5356] [nu = 480] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48976] [nf = 6060] [nu = 540] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 54290] [nf = 6764] [nu = 600] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 59604] [nf = 7468] [nu = 660] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 64918] [nf = 8172] [nu = 720] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 70232] [nf = 8876] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 75546] [nf = 9580] [nu = 840] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 80860] [nf = 10284] [nu = 900] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 86174] [nf = 10988] [nu = 960] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 91488] [nf = 11692] [nu = 1020] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 96802] [nf = 12396] [nu = 1080] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 102116] [nf = 13100] [nu = 1140] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 107430] [nf = 13804] [nu = 1200] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 112744] [nf = 14508] [nu = 1260] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 118058] [nf = 15212] [nu = 1320] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 123372] [nf = 15916] [nu = 1380] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 128686] [nf = 16620] [nu = 1440] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 134000] [nf = 17324] [nu = 1500] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 139314] [nf = 18028] [nu = 1560] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 139314] [nf = 18028] [nu = 1560] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 139434] [nf = 18028] [nu = 1560] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 139554] [nf = 18028] [nu = 1560] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 141088] [nf = 18092] [nu = 1560] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 152156] [nf = 18890] [nu = 1620] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 245524] [nf = 23773] [nu = 1680] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 1206623] [nf = 92991] [nu = 1740] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth
% = 8 ...
% t = 42 secs [nr = 8019537] [nf = 862006] [nu = 1800] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 301 secs [nr = 39796862] [nf = 6523158] [nu = 1860] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 47069588
% resolvents: 40423701 factors: 6645887
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1862
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1862 [2] = 29468 [3] = 262583 [4] = 1218664 [5] = 11261654 [6] = 28563096
% [7] = 5069570 [8] = 644798 [9] = 17893
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [32] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 260424218
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 839572561
% Number of successful unifications: 47069588
% Number of unification failures: 147486446
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2494925276
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3865003135
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 119
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 101
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 194556034
% ConstructUnitClause() = 120
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 156899
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------