TSTP Solution File: SYN460-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN460-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:25:39 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.07s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP7307/SYN/SYN460-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 60] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 120] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 780] [nf = 30] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3381] [nf = 330] [nu = 30] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 5982] [nf = 630] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 8663] [nf = 988] [nu = 90] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11344] [nf = 1346] [nu = 120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 14121] [nf = 1788] [nu = 150] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16898] [nf = 2230] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19675] [nf = 2672] [nu = 210] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 22452] [nf = 3114] [nu = 240] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 25229] [nf = 3556] [nu = 270] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 28006] [nf = 3998] [nu = 300] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 30783] [nf = 4440] [nu = 330] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 33560] [nf = 4882] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 36337] [nf = 5324] [nu = 390] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 39114] [nf = 5766] [nu = 420] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 41891] [nf = 6208] [nu = 450] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 44668] [nf = 6650] [nu = 480] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 47445] [nf = 7092] [nu = 510] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 50222] [nf = 7534] [nu = 540] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 52999] [nf = 7976] [nu = 570] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 55776] [nf = 8418] [nu = 600] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 58553] [nf = 8860] [nu = 630] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 61330] [nf = 9302] [nu = 660] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 64107] [nf = 9744] [nu = 690] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 66884] [nf = 10186] [nu = 720] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 69661] [nf = 10628] [nu = 750] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 72438] [nf = 11070] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 72438] [nf = 11070] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 72498] [nf = 11070] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 72558] [nf = 11070] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 73734] [nf = 11104] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 97646] [nf = 12074] [nu = 810] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 265878] [nf = 20063] [nu = 840] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 15 secs [nr = 181244
% 0] [nf = 118880] [nu = 870] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 130 secs [nr = 13058990] [nf = 1195582] [nu = 900] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 26548584
% resolvents: 23579996 factors: 2968588
% Number of unit clauses generated: 922
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 922 [2] = 12892 [3] = 99819 [4] = 671765 [5] = 5225084 [6] = 18324179
% [7] = 1200119 [8] = 1005710 [9] = 8094
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp31 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp32 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp33 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp34 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp35 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp36 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] hskp37 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] hskp38 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] hskp39 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] hskp40 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] hskp41 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] hskp42 (+)0 (-)0
% [38] hskp43 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] hskp44 (+)0 (-)0
% [40] hskp45 (+)0 (-)0
% [41] hskp46 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] hskp47 (+)0 (-)0
% [43] hskp48 (+)0 (-)0
% [44] hskp49 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [46] hskp50 (+)0 (-)0
% [47] hskp51 (+)0 (-)0
% [48] hskp52 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] hskp53 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] hskp54 (+)0 (-)0
% [51] hskp55 (+)0 (-)0
% [52] hskp56 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] hskp57 (+)0 (-)0
% [54] hskp58 (+)0 (-)0
% [55] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [56] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [57] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [58] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [59] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [60] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [61] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [62] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [63] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 169208004
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2200143369
% Number of successful unifications: 26548584
% Number of unification failures: 144925591
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2306939886
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3189662814
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 59
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 157
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 171474175
% ConstructUnitClause() = 60
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.01 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 88495
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------