TSTP Solution File: SYN458-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN458-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:25:14 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29043/SYN/SYN458-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 84] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 160] [nf = 2] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 600] [nf = 22] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2219] [nf = 204] [nu = 24] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3838] [nf = 386] [nu = 44] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5516] [nf = 608] [nu = 64] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 7194] [nf = 830] [nu = 84] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 8912] [nf = 1086] [nu = 104] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 10630] [nf = 1342] [nu = 124] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 12348] [nf = 1598] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 14066] [nf = 1854] [nu = 164] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 15784] [nf = 2110] [nu = 184] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 17502] [nf = 2366] [nu = 204] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 19220] [nf = 2622] [nu = 224] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 20938] [nf = 2878] [nu = 244] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 22656] [nf = 3134] [nu = 264] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 24374] [nf = 3390] [nu = 284] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 26092] [nf = 3646] [nu = 304] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 27810] [nf = 3902] [nu = 324] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 29528] [nf = 4158] [nu = 344] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 31246] [nf = 4414] [nu = 364] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 32964] [nf = 4670] [nu = 384] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 34682] [nf = 4926] [nu = 404] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 36400] [nf = 5182] [nu = 424] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 38118] [nf = 5438] [nu = 444] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 39836] [nf = 5694] [nu = 464] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 41554] [nf = 5950] [nu = 484] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 43272] [nf = 6206] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 44990] [nf = 6462] [nu = 524] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 44998] [nf = 6462] [nu = 524] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 45074] [nf = 6462] [nu = 524] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 45150] [nf = 6464] [nu = 526] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 45878] [nf = 6492] [nu = 528] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 56117] [nf = 7153] [nu = 548] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 138996] [nf = 12534] [nu = 568] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 4 secs [nr = 733410] [nf = 57984] [nu = 588] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 38 secs [nr = 5975575] [nf = 598704] [nu =
%  608] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 297 secs [nr = 33875844] [nf = 4808389] [nu = 628] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 39585023
% 	resolvents: 34644848	factors: 4940175
% Number of unit clauses generated: 630
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [3] = 1		
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 630	[2] = 11830	[3] = 125867	[4] = 1336681	[5] = 8838707	[6] = 25859139	
% [7] = 2423943	[8] = 959859	[9] = 28367	
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0		(+)0	(-)0
% [1] hskp1		(+)0	(-)0
% [2] hskp10		(+)0	(-)0
% [3] hskp11		(+)0	(-)0
% [4] hskp12		(+)0	(-)0
% [5] hskp13		(+)0	(-)0
% [6] hskp14		(+)0	(-)0
% [7] hskp15		(+)0	(-)0
% [8] hskp16		(+)0	(-)0
% [9] hskp17		(+)0	(-)0
% [10] hskp18		(+)0	(-)0
% [11] hskp19		(+)0	(-)0
% [12] hskp2		(+)0	(-)0
% [13] hskp20		(+)0	(-)0
% [14] hskp21		(+)0	(-)0
% [15] hskp22		(+)0	(-)0
% [16] hskp23		(+)0	(-)0
% [17] hskp24		(+)0	(-)0
% [18] hskp25		(+)0	(-)0
% [19] hskp26		(+)0	(-)0
% [20] hskp27		(+)0	(-)0
% [21] hskp28		(+)0	(-)0
% [22] hskp29		(+)0	(-)0
% [23] hskp3		(+)0	(-)0
% [24] hskp30		(+)0	(-)0
% [25] hskp31		(+)0	(-)0
% [26] hskp4		(+)0	(-)0
% [27] hskp5		(+)0	(-)0
% [28] hskp6		(+)0	(-)0
% [29] hskp7		(+)0	(-)0
% [30] hskp8		(+)0	(-)0
% [31] hskp9		(+)0	(-)0
% [32] ndr1_0		(+)1	(-)0
% [33] c0_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [34] c1_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [35] c2_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [36] c3_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)1	(-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 273442854
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 1944264738
% Number of successful unifications: 39585023
% Number of unification failures: 118410769
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1932574292
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2878156792
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 39
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 103
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 157995792
% ConstructUnitClause() = 40
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 131950
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------