TSTP Solution File: SYN454-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN454-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:23:02 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP954/SYN/SYN454-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 144] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 288] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1872] [nf = 72] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8086] [nf = 792] [nu = 72] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14305] [nf = 1516] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20576] [nf = 2276] [nu = 216] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 26847] [nf = 3036] [nu = 288] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 33195] [nf = 3864] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 39543] [nf = 4692] [nu = 432] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 45891] [nf = 5520] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 52239] [nf = 6348] [nu = 576] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 58587] [nf = 7176] [nu = 648] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 64935] [nf = 8004] [nu = 720] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 71283] [nf = 8832] [nu = 792] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 77631] [nf = 9660] [nu = 864] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 83979] [nf = 10488] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 90327] [nf = 11316] [nu = 1008] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 96675] [nf = 12144] [nu = 1080] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 103023] [nf = 12972] [nu = 1152] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 109371] [nf = 13800] [nu = 1224] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 115719] [nf = 14628] [nu = 1296] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 122067] [nf = 15456] [nu = 1368] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 128415] [nf = 16284] [nu = 1440] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 134763] [nf = 17112] [nu = 1512] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 141111] [nf = 17940] [nu = 1584] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 147459] [nf = 18768] [nu = 1656] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 153807] [nf = 19596] [nu = 1728] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 160155] [nf = 20424] [nu = 1800] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 166503] [nf = 21252] [nu = 1872] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 166503] [nf = 21252] [nu = 1872] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 166647] [nf = 21252] [nu = 1872] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 166791] [nf = 21252] [nu = 1872] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 168513] [nf = 21326] [nu = 1872] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 178885] [nf = 22173] [nu = 1944] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 270643] [nf = 27636] [nu = 2016] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 1250922] [nf = 100040] [nu = 2088] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at de
% pth = 8 ...
% t = 39 secs [nr = 8007571] [nf = 910696] [nu = 2160] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 290 secs [nr = 39435096] [nf = 6890027] [nu = 2232] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 48871061
% resolvents: 41515249 factors: 7355812
% Number of unit clauses generated: 2236
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 2236 [2] = 32962 [3] = 275362 [4] = 1181975 [5] = 11926240 [6] = 28530028
% [7] = 6299038 [8] = 603216 [9] = 20004
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [31] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 272730771
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 750471069
% Number of successful unifications: 48871061
% Number of unification failures: 148196371
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2615316407
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3911918627
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 143
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 99
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 197067432
% ConstructUnitClause() = 144
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 162904
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------