TSTP Solution File: SYN451-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN451-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:20:08 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP1855/SYN/SYN451-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 108] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 208] [nf = 2] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 909] [nf = 34] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3552] [nf = 336] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6195] [nf = 638] [nu = 68] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 8906] [nf = 986] [nu = 100] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11617] [nf = 1334] [nu = 132] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 14386] [nf = 1732] [nu = 164] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 17155] [nf = 2130] [nu = 196] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19924] [nf = 2528] [nu = 228] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 22693] [nf = 2926] [nu = 260] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 25462] [nf = 3324] [nu = 292] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 28231] [nf = 3722] [nu = 324] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31000] [nf = 4120] [nu = 356] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 33769] [nf = 4518] [nu = 388] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36538] [nf = 4916] [nu = 420] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 39307] [nf = 5314] [nu = 452] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 42076] [nf = 5712] [nu = 484] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 44845] [nf = 6110] [nu = 516] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 47614] [nf = 6508] [nu = 548] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 50383] [nf = 6906] [nu = 580] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 53152] [nf = 7304] [nu = 612] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 55921] [nf = 7702] [nu = 644] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 58690] [nf = 8100] [nu = 676] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 61459] [nf = 8498] [nu = 708] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 64228] [nf = 8896] [nu = 740] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 66997] [nf = 9294] [nu = 772] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 69766] [nf = 9692] [nu = 804] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 72535] [nf = 10090] [nu = 836] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 72543] [nf = 10090] [nu = 836] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 72643] [nf = 10090] [nu = 836] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 72743] [nf = 10092] [nu = 838] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 73510] [nf = 10125] [nu = 840] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 79126] [nf = 10526] [nu = 872] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 144765] [nf = 14675] [nu = 904] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 693454] [nf = 58173] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 20 secs [nr = 3934800] [nf = 393561] [nu = 9
% 68] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 149 secs [nr = 20460060] [nf = 2831960] [nu = 1000] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 47490558
% resolvents: 41253884 factors: 6236674
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1026
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [3] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1026 [2] = 16202 [3] = 147521 [4] = 1207602 [5] = 9088173 [6] = 24109229
% [7] = 9791399 [8] = 3035327 [9] = 94079
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [30] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 213025242
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1570942568
% Number of successful unifications: 47490558
% Number of unification failures: 100052601
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2093563432
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2954402790
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 63
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 97
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 147543159
% ConstructUnitClause() = 64
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 158302
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------