TSTP Solution File: SYN450-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN450-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:21:46 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23100/SYN/SYN450-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 72] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 144] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 936] [nf = 36] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4058] [nf = 396] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 7185] [nf = 760] [nu = 72] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10369] [nf = 1162] [nu = 108] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 13553] [nf = 1564] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16795] [nf = 2016] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 20037] [nf = 2468] [nu = 216] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 23279] [nf = 2920] [nu = 252] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 26521] [nf = 3372] [nu = 288] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29763] [nf = 3824] [nu = 324] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 33005] [nf = 4276] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36247] [nf = 4728] [nu = 396] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 39489] [nf = 5180] [nu = 432] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 42731] [nf = 5632] [nu = 468] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 45973] [nf = 6084] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 49215] [nf = 6536] [nu = 540] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 52457] [nf = 6988] [nu = 576] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 55699] [nf = 7440] [nu = 612] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 58941] [nf = 7892] [nu = 648] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 62183] [nf = 8344] [nu = 684] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 65425] [nf = 8796] [nu = 720] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 68667] [nf = 9248] [nu = 756] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 71909] [nf = 9700] [nu = 792] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 75151] [nf = 10152] [nu = 828] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 78393] [nf = 10604] [nu = 864] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 81635] [nf = 11056] [nu = 900] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 84877] [nf = 11508] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 84877] [nf = 11508] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 84949] [nf = 11508] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 85021] [nf = 11508] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 85813] [nf = 11544] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 90805] [nf = 11970] [nu = 972] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 161635] [nf = 16969] [nu = 1008] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 791212] [nf = 64800] [nu = 1044] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 13 secs [nr = 2258375] [nf = 236
% 688] [nu = 1080] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 91 secs [nr = 11972418] [nf = 1436935] [nu = 1116] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 46054389
% resolvents: 40946817 factors: 5107572
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1152
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1152 [2] = 18320 [3] = 179445 [4] = 1238894 [5] = 7307595 [6] = 18893023
% [7] = 15937827 [8] = 2415024 [9] = 63109
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [31] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 222507921
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2067012523
% Number of successful unifications: 46054389
% Number of unification failures: 61447889
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1706587657
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2019583494
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 71
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 99
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 107502278
% ConstructUnitClause() = 72
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 153515
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------