TSTP Solution File: SYN449-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN449-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:19:47 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP32247/SYN/SYN449-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 72] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 144] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 936] [nf = 36] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4061] [nf = 396] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7186] [nf = 756] [nu = 72] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10361] [nf = 1148] [nu = 108] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13536] [nf = 1540] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16762] [nf = 1976] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19988] [nf = 2412] [nu = 216] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23214] [nf = 2848] [nu = 252] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 26440] [nf = 3284] [nu = 288] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 29666] [nf = 3720] [nu = 324] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 32892] [nf = 4156] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 36118] [nf = 4592] [nu = 396] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 39344] [nf = 5028] [nu = 432] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 42570] [nf = 5464] [nu = 468] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 45796] [nf = 5900] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 49022] [nf = 6336] [nu = 540] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 52248] [nf = 6772] [nu = 576] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 55474] [nf = 7208] [nu = 612] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 58700] [nf = 7644] [nu = 648] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 61926] [nf = 8080] [nu = 684] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 65152] [nf = 8516] [nu = 720] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 68378] [nf = 8952] [nu = 756] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 71604] [nf = 9388] [nu = 792] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 74830] [nf = 9824] [nu = 828] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 78056] [nf = 10260] [nu = 864] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 81282] [nf = 10696] [nu = 900] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 84508] [nf = 11132] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 84508] [nf = 11132] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 84580] [nf = 11132] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 84652] [nf = 11132] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 85444] [nf = 11168] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 90773] [nf = 11593] [nu = 972] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 178424] [nf = 16759] [nu = 1008] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 938491] [nf = 74494] [nu = 1044] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 18 secs [nr = 3320273] [n
% f = 343739] [nu = 1080] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 113 secs [nr = 14969380] [nf = 1873433] [nu = 1116] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 45891634
% resolvents: 40788876 factors: 5102758
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1148
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1148 [2] = 18830 [3] = 177590 [4] = 1249059 [5] = 7319533 [6] = 19698582
% [7] = 15097007 [8] = 2281344 [9] = 48541
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp31 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [33] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 232994283
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2155718132
% Number of successful unifications: 45891634
% Number of unification failures: 71018512
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1937442792
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2364971204
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 71
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 103
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 116910146
% ConstructUnitClause() = 72
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 152972
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------