TSTP Solution File: SYN438-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN438-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:13:00 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5469/SYN/SYN438-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 84] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 168] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1092] [nf = 42] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4720] [nf = 462] [nu = 42] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8348] [nf = 882] [nu = 84] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12017] [nf = 1326] [nu = 126] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15686] [nf = 1770] [nu = 168] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19413] [nf = 2264] [nu = 210] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 23140] [nf = 2758] [nu = 252] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 26867] [nf = 3252] [nu = 294] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 30594] [nf = 3746] [nu = 336] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 34321] [nf = 4240] [nu = 378] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 38048] [nf = 4734] [nu = 420] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 41775] [nf = 5228] [nu = 462] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 45502] [nf = 5722] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 49229] [nf = 6216] [nu = 546] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 52956] [nf = 6710] [nu = 588] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 56683] [nf = 7204] [nu = 630] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 60410] [nf = 7698] [nu = 672] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 64137] [nf = 8192] [nu = 714] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 67864] [nf = 8686] [nu = 756] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 71591] [nf = 9180] [nu = 798] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 75318] [nf = 9674] [nu = 840] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 79045] [nf = 10168] [nu = 882] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 82772] [nf = 10662] [nu = 924] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 86499] [nf = 11156] [nu = 966] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 90226] [nf = 11650] [nu = 1008] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 93953] [nf = 12144] [nu = 1050] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 97680] [nf = 12638] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 97680] [nf = 12638] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 97764] [nf = 12638] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 97848] [nf = 12638] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 98841] [nf = 12681] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 104894] [nf = 13205] [nu = 1134] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 155953] [nf = 16397] [nu = 1176] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 707320] [nf = 59392] [nu = 1218] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 18 secs [nr = 3577427] [nf = 4187
% 70] [nu = 1260] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 16407063] [nf = 2850945] [nu = 1302] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 46979381
% resolvents: 39609055 factors: 7370326
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1344
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1344 [2] = 21282 [3] = 188530 [4] = 1218534 [5] = 9476714 [6] = 22608779
% [7] = 10956741 [8] = 2419737 [9] = 87720
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [31] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 206520238
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1460391839
% Number of successful unifications: 46979381
% Number of unification failures: 116342561
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2283543075
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3332844933
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 83
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 99
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 163321942
% ConstructUnitClause() = 84
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 156598
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------