TSTP Solution File: SYN431-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN431-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:08:46 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP937/SYN/SYN431-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 48] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 96] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 624] [nf = 24] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2696] [nf = 264] [nu = 24] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4771] [nf = 506] [nu = 48] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6848] [nf = 748] [nu = 72] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8925] [nf = 990] [nu = 96] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11013] [nf = 1242] [nu = 120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 13101] [nf = 1494] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15189] [nf = 1746] [nu = 168] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 17277] [nf = 1998] [nu = 192] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19365] [nf = 2250] [nu = 216] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 21453] [nf = 2502] [nu = 240] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 23541] [nf = 2754] [nu = 264] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 25629] [nf = 3006] [nu = 288] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27717] [nf = 3258] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29805] [nf = 3510] [nu = 336] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31893] [nf = 3762] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 33981] [nf = 4014] [nu = 384] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36069] [nf = 4266] [nu = 408] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 38157] [nf = 4518] [nu = 432] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40245] [nf = 4770] [nu = 456] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 42333] [nf = 5022] [nu = 480] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 44421] [nf = 5274] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 46509] [nf = 5526] [nu = 528] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48597] [nf = 5778] [nu = 552] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 50685] [nf = 6030] [nu = 576] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 52773] [nf = 6282] [nu = 600] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 54861] [nf = 6534] [nu = 624] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 54861] [nf = 6534] [nu = 624] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 54909] [nf = 6534] [nu = 624] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 54957] [nf = 6534] [nu = 624] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 55485] [nf = 6558] [nu = 624] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 58129] [nf = 6817] [nu = 648] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 81480] [nf = 8511] [nu = 672] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 309721] [nf = 26390] [nu = 696] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 1277854] [nf = 151578] [nu = 720] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 25
% secs [nr = 3606338] [nf = 470664] [nu = 744] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 145 secs [nr = 20389648] [nf = 2586541] [nu = 768] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 49312179
% resolvents: 41794795 factors: 7517384
% Number of unit clauses generated: 788
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 788 [2] = 14960 [3] = 214070 [4] = 1722398 [5] = 7427968 [6] = 20534183
% [7] = 16147841 [8] = 3055119 [9] = 194852
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [30] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 111760699
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2009987612
% Number of successful unifications: 49312179
% Number of unification failures: 98041543
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2103625151
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3008325143
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 47
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 97
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 147353722
% ConstructUnitClause() = 48
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 164374
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------