TSTP Solution File: SYN431-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN431-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:10:51 EDT 2023

% Result   : Satisfiable 11.47s 3.94s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SYN431-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:21:09 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 11.47/3.94  
% 11.47/3.94  % SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.47/3.94  
% 11.47/3.94  Inference rules
% 11.47/3.94  ----------------------
% 11.47/3.94  #Ref     : 0
% 11.47/3.94  #Sup     : 1386
% 11.47/3.94  #Fact    : 0
% 11.47/3.94  #Define  : 0
% 11.47/3.94  #Split   : 1869
% 11.47/3.94  #Chain   : 0
% 11.47/3.94  #Close   : 0
% 11.47/3.94  
% 11.47/3.94  Ordering : KBO
% 11.47/3.94  
% 11.47/3.94  Simplification rules
% 11.47/3.94  ----------------------
% 11.47/3.94  #Subsume      : 2774
% 11.47/3.94  #Demod        : 2031
% 11.47/3.94  #Tautology    : 520
% 11.47/3.94  #SimpNegUnit  : 1007
% 11.47/3.94  #BackRed      : 0
% 11.47/3.94  
% 11.47/3.94  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 11.47/3.94  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 11.47/3.94  
% 11.47/3.94  Timing (in seconds)
% 11.47/3.94  ----------------------
% 11.47/3.94  Preprocessing        : 0.67
% 11.47/3.94  Parsing              : 0.33
% 11.47/3.94  CNF conversion       : 0.06
% 11.47/3.94  Main loop            : 2.24
% 11.47/3.94  Inferencing          : 0.64
% 11.47/3.94  Reduction            : 0.74
% 11.47/3.94  Demodulation         : 0.45
% 11.47/3.94  BG Simplification    : 0.08
% 11.47/3.94  Subsumption          : 0.43
% 11.47/3.94  Abstraction          : 0.05
% 11.47/3.94  MUC search           : 0.00
% 11.47/3.94  Cooper               : 0.00
% 11.47/3.94  Total                : 2.93
% 11.47/3.94  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 11.47/3.94  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 11.47/3.94  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 11.47/3.95  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------