TSTP Solution File: SYN430-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN430-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:08:32 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP27765/SYN/SYN430-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 36] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 72] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 468] [nf = 18] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2024] [nf = 198] [nu = 18] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3583] [nf = 380] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5148] [nf = 566] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6713] [nf = 752] [nu = 72] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8292] [nf = 950] [nu = 90] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9871] [nf = 1148] [nu = 108] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11450] [nf = 1346] [nu = 126] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13029] [nf = 1544] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14608] [nf = 1742] [nu = 162] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16187] [nf = 1940] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 17766] [nf = 2138] [nu = 198] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19345] [nf = 2336] [nu = 216] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20924] [nf = 2534] [nu = 234] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 22503] [nf = 2732] [nu = 252] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24082] [nf = 2930] [nu = 270] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25661] [nf = 3128] [nu = 288] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27240] [nf = 3326] [nu = 306] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 28819] [nf = 3524] [nu = 324] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30398] [nf = 3722] [nu = 342] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 31977] [nf = 3920] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 33556] [nf = 4118] [nu = 378] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35135] [nf = 4316] [nu = 396] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 36714] [nf = 4514] [nu = 414] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 38293] [nf = 4712] [nu = 432] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 39872] [nf = 4910] [nu = 450] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 41451] [nf = 5108] [nu = 468] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 41451] [nf = 5108] [nu = 468] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 41487] [nf = 5108] [nu = 468] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 41523] [nf = 5108] [nu = 468] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 41919] [nf = 5126] [nu = 468] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 43949] [nf = 5329] [nu = 486] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 59799] [nf = 6803] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 204754] [nf = 18726] [nu = 522] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 790220] [nf = 94993] [nu = 540] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 13 secs [nr = 2275811]
% [nf = 284881] [nu = 558] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 75 secs [nr = 12793997] [nf = 1448052] [nu = 576] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 59453160
% resolvents: 50740869 factors: 8712291
% Number of unit clauses generated: 594
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 594 [2] = 12552 [3] = 230296 [4] = 2320338 [5] = 9181562 [6] = 24352745
% [7] = 19756154 [8] = 3340956 [9] = 257963
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [26] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 122395008
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2020423811
% Number of successful unifications: 59453160
% Number of unification failures: 87567853
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1826949059
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2834006956
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 3
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 35
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 89
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 147021013
% ConstructUnitClause() = 36
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 198177
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------