TSTP Solution File: SYN428-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN428-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:07:18 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP32240/SYN/SYN428-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 44] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 858] [nf = 31] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2958] [nf = 117] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 9215] [nf = 471] [nu = 21] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 24909] [nf = 1554] [nu = 80] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 56707] [nf = 4147] [nu = 231] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 116887] [nf = 9911] [nu = 512] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 220319] [nf = 20372] [nu = 1065] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 13 secs [nr = 382411] [nf = 38508] [nu = 1900] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 23 secs [nr = 637391] [nf = 67675] [nu = 3103] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 37 secs [nr = 1031009] [nf = 114004] [nu = 4988] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 60 secs [nr = 1688475] [nf = 196004] [nu = 8742] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 102 secs [nr = 2803491] [nf = 343095] [nu = 16219] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 3374933] [nf = 418676] [nu = 19723] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 3375747] [nf = 418707] [nu = 19725] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 3379897] [nf = 418857] [nu = 19727] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 3406429] [nf = 419997] [nu = 19744] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 125 secs [nr = 3566974] [nf = 430482] [nu = 19803] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 134 secs [nr = 4563942] [nf = 506655] [nu = 19956] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 199 secs [nr = 12295203] [nf = 1175608] [nu = 20282] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 26778341
% resolvents: 24440832 factors: 2337509
% Number of unit clauses generated: 20825
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.08
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [2] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 20825 [2] = 623162 [3] = 3847045 [4] = 3726055 [5] = 11145606 [6] = 6486898
% [7] = 891180 [8] = 36098 [9] = 1057 [10] = 147 [11] = 97 [12] = 63
% [13] = 76 [14] = 32
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c10_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] c6_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] c7_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] c8_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] c9_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC10 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkC11 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkC12 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkC13 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ssSkC14 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ssSkC15 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkC16 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkC17 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ssSkC18 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkC19 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] ssSkC20 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] ssSkC21 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] ssSkC22 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] ssSkC23 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] ssSkC24 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ssSkC25 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ssSkC26 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ssSkC27 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ssSkC28 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] ssSkC29 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] ssSkC30 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] ssSkC31 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] ssSkC32 (+)0 (-)0
% [38] ssSkC33 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] ssSkC34 (+)0 (-)0
% [40] ssSkC35 (+)0 (-)0
% [41] ssSkC36 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] ssSkC37 (+)0 (-)0
% [43] ssSkC38 (+)0 (-)0
% [44] ssSkC39 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [46] ssSkC40 (+)0 (-)0
% [47] ssSkC41 (+)0 (-)0
% [48] ssSkC42 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] ssSkC43 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [51] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [52] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] ssSkC8 (+)0 (-)0
% [54] ssSkC9 (+)0 (-)0
% [55] c10_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [56] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [57] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [58] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [59] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [60] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [61] c6_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [62] c7_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [63] c8_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [64] c9_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [65] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [66] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [67] ssSkP10_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [68] ssSkP11_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [69] ssSkP12_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [70] ssSkP13_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [71] ssSkP14_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [72] ssSkP15_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [73] ssSkP16_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [74] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [75] ssSkP2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [76] ssSkP3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [77] ssSkP4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [78] ssSkP5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [79] ssSkP6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [80] ssSkP7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [81] ssSkP8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [82] ssSkP9_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [83] c10_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [84] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [85] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [86] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [87] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [88] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [89] c6_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [90] c7_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [91] c8_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [92] c9_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1582812812
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1035299903
% Number of successful unifications: 26778341
% Number of unification failures: 477767
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 390456233
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2635164956
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 9865
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 326
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 27256108
% ConstructUnitClause() = 9866
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.02 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 89261
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------