TSTP Solution File: SYN425-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN425-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:06:03 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.02s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20870/SYN/SYN425-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 89] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1025] [nf = 36] [nu = 16] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3671] [nf = 160] [nu = 38] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12899] [nf = 776] [nu = 67] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 38821] [nf = 2511] [nu = 137] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 108136] [nf = 7426] [nu = 263] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 294359] [nf = 21820] [nu = 603] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 786760] [nf = 59476] [nu = 1523] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 38 secs [nr = 2106565] [nf = 170428] [nu = 4287] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 100 secs [nr = 5443926] [nf = 436485] [nu = 11583] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 6626733] [nf = 550577] [nu = 15582] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 6627669] [nf = 550613] [nu = 15598] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 6630902] [nf = 550754] [nu = 15620] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 6649140] [nf = 551830] [nu = 15649] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 6752343] [nf = 558850] [nu = 15727] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 129 secs [nr = 7432729] [nf = 607898] [nu = 15887] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 163 secs [nr = 11761168] [nf = 965747] [nu = 16370] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 31836513
% resolvents: 29269750 factors: 2566763
% Number of unit clauses generated: 18179
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.06
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 4 [2] = 7
% Total = 11
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 18179 [2] = 1403746 [3] = 8009916 [4] = 8614654 [5] = 7974804 [6] = 4796608
% [7] = 979458 [8] = 37772 [9] = 1284 [10] = 87 [11] = 5
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c10_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c4_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [5] c5_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [6] c6_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] c7_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [8] c8_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] c9_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [10] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC10 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkC11 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkC12 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkC13 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ssSkC14 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ssSkC15 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkC16 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkC17 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ssSkC18 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkC19 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] ssSkC20 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] ssSkC21 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] ssSkC22 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] ssSkC23 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] ssSkC24 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ssSkC25 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ssSkC26 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ssSkC27 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ssSkC28 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] ssSkC29 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] ssSkC30 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] ssSkC31 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] ssSkC32 (+)0 (-)0
% [38] ssSkC33 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] ssSkC34 (+)0 (-)0
% [40] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [41] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [43] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [44] ssSkC8 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] ssSkC9 (+)0 (-)0
% [46] c10_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [47] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [48] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [51] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [52] c6_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] c7_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [54] c8_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [55] c9_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [56] ndr1_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [57] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [58] ssSkP10_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [59] ssSkP11_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [60] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [61] ssSkP2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [62] ssSkP3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [63] ssSkP4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [64] ssSkP5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [65] ssSkP6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [66] ssSkP7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [67] ssSkP8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [68] ssSkP9_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [69] c10_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [70] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [71] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [72] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [73] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [74] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [75] c6_2_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [76] c7_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [77] c8_2_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [78] c9_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)5 (-)6
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 11
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1173946424
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 834428239
% Number of successful unifications: 31836513
% Number of unification failures: 679481
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 503874457
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2662910886
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 11444
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 12
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 9
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.33
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 262
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 32515994
% ConstructUnitClause() = 11451
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.02 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 106122
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------