TSTP Solution File: SYN424-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN424-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:04:03 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5293/SYN/SYN424-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 79] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 907] [nf = 35] [nu = 1] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2750] [nf = 93] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 7486] [nf = 332] [nu = 9] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16439] [nf = 707] [nu = 20] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 34023] [nf = 1475] [nu = 43] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 88396] [nf = 3928] [nu = 175] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 313478] [nf = 12145] [nu = 1046] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 20 secs [nr = 889632] [nf = 38248] [nu = 3139] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 54 secs [nr = 2239457] [nf = 101580] [nu = 8164] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 128 secs [nr = 5166484] [nf = 237819] [nu = 15642] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 128 secs [nr = 5167360] [nf = 237854] [nu = 15646] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 128 secs [nr = 5171757] [nf = 238070] [nu = 15652] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 128 secs [nr = 5200147] [nf = 239509] [nu = 15672] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 130 secs [nr = 5379190] [nf = 250171] [nu = 15739] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 142 secs [nr = 6483227] [nf = 329250] [nu = 15948] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 219 secs [nr = 13760768] [nf = 909652] [nu = 16606] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 25564367
% resolvents: 23793399 factors: 1770968
% Number of unit clauses generated: 17971
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.07
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [2] = 1 [7] = 2
% [8] = 1
% Total = 4
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 17971 [2] = 836898 [3] = 6070767 [4] = 4976420 [5] = 7856761 [6] = 4663772
% [7] = 1060818 [8] = 80072 [9] = 837 [10] = 31 [11] = 18 [12] = 2
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c10_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [1] c1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [2] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] c6_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] c7_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] c8_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [9] c9_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC10 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkC11 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkC12 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkC13 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ssSkC14 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ssSkC15 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkC16 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkC17 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ssSkC18 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkC19 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] ssSkC20 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] ssSkC21 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] ssSkC22 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] ssSkC23 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] ssSkC24 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ssSkC25 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ssSkC26 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ssSkC27 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ssSkC28 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] ssSkC29 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] ssSkC30 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] ssSkC31 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] ssSkC32 (+)0 (-)0
% [38] ssSkC33 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] ssSkC34 (+)0 (-)0
% [40] ssSkC35 (+)0 (-)0
% [41] ssSkC36 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] ssSkC37 (+)0 (-)0
% [43] ssSkC38 (+)0 (-)0
% [44] ssSkC39 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [46] ssSkC40 (+)0 (-)0
% [47] ssSkC41 (+)0 (-)0
% [48] ssSkC42 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] ssSkC43 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] ssSkC44 (+)0 (-)0
% [51] ssSkC45 (+)0 (-)0
% [52] ssSkC46 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] ssSkC47 (+)0 (-)0
% [54] ssSkC48 (+)0 (-)0
% [55] ssSkC49 (+)0 (-)0
% [56] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [57] ssSkC50 (+)0 (-)0
% [58] ssSkC51 (+)0 (-)0
% [59] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [60] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [61] ssSkC8 (+)0 (-)0
% [62] ssSkC9 (+)0 (-)0
% [63] c10_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [64] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [65] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [66] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [67] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [68] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [69] c6_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [70] c7_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [71] c8_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [72] c9_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [73] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [74] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [75] ssSkP10_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [76] ssSkP11_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [77] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [78] ssSkP2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [79] ssSkP3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [80] ssSkP4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [81] ssSkP5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [82] ssSkP6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [83] ssSkP7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [84] ssSkP8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [85] ssSkP9_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [86] c10_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [87] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [88] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [89] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [90] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [91] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [92] c6_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [93] c7_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [94] c8_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [95] c9_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)2
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 4
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1419500838
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 932382650
% Number of successful unifications: 25564367
% Number of unification failures: 519311
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 397135754
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2636291380
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 9295
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 357
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 26083678
% ConstructUnitClause() = 9299
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 85215
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 316 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------