TSTP Solution File: SYN422-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN422-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:03:29 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.02s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP461/SYN/SYN422-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 7] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 603] [nf = 31] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1497] [nf = 68] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4178] [nf = 229] [nu = 6] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 8766] [nf = 608] [nu = 16] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 17146] [nf = 1306] [nu = 39] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 34467] [nf = 3024] [nu = 135] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 70412] [nf = 6552] [nu = 300] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 147182] [nf = 13668] [nu = 607] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 303322] [nf = 29369] [nu = 1305] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 634154] [nf = 63860] [nu = 2616] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 30 secs [nr = 1311735] [nf = 130761] [nu = 5154] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 63 secs [nr = 2773060] [nf = 271820] [nu = 11459] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 5472767] [nf = 529576] [nu = 21567] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 5473363] [nf = 529607] [nu = 21567] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 5475507] [nf = 529693] [nu = 21567] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 5488191] [nf = 530646] [nu = 21573] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 5546803] [nf = 537032] [nu = 21583] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 126 secs [nr = 5840234] [nf = 574303] [nu = 21621] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 141 secs [nr = 7498647] [nf = 791900] [nu = 21814] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 227 secs [nr = 17735435] [nf = 2260047] [nu = 22220] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 31000110
% resolvents: 27365695 factors: 3634415
% Number of unit clauses generated: 22476
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.07
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [4] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 22476 [2] = 962009 [3] = 5763691 [4] = 3320875 [5] = 8035128 [6] = 8746170
% [7] = 3589142 [8] = 509898 [9] = 50003 [10] = 494 [11] = 99 [12] = 90
% [13] = 19 [14] = 16
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c10_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] c6_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] c7_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] c8_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] c9_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC10 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkC11 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkC12 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkC13 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ssSkC14 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ssSkC15 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkC16 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkC17 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ssSkC18 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkC19 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] ssSkC20 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] ssSkC21 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] ssSkC22 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] ssSkC23 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] ssSkC24 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ssSkC25 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ssSkC26 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ssSkC27 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ssSkC28 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] ssSkC29 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] ssSkC30 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] ssSkC31 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] ssSkC32 (+)0 (-)0
% [38] ssSkC33 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] ssSkC34 (+)0 (-)0
% [40] ssSkC35 (+)0 (-)0
% [41] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [43] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [44] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] ssSkC8 (+)0 (-)0
% [46] ssSkC9 (+)0 (-)0
% [47] c10_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [48] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [51] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [52] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] c6_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [54] c7_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [55] c8_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [56] c9_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [57] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [58] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [59] ssSkP10_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [60] ssSkP11_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [61] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [62] ssSkP2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [63] ssSkP3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [64] ssSkP4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [65] ssSkP5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [66] ssSkP6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [67] ssSkP7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [68] ssSkP8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [69] ssSkP9_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [70] c10_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [71] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [72] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [73] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [74] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [75] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [76] c6_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [77] c7_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [78] c8_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [79] c9_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1423012074
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 967602892
% Number of successful unifications: 31000110
% Number of unification failures: 471369
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 469844876
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2487758542
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 12258
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 266
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 31471479
% ConstructUnitClause() = 12259
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.04 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 103334
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------