TSTP Solution File: SYN420-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN420-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:02:25 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.07s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4629/SYN/SYN420-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 24] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 788] [nf = 25] [nu = 1] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 1876] [nf = 71] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 5439] [nf = 305] [nu = 19] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 10472] [nf = 605] [nu = 40] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 16144] [nf = 988] [nu = 66] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 23408] [nf = 1642] [nu = 100] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 30784] [nf = 2312] [nu = 134] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 38549] [nf = 3069] [nu = 170] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 46595] [nf = 3891] [nu = 210] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 54687] [nf = 4721] [nu = 250] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 62888] [nf = 5588] [nu = 292] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 71126] [nf = 6485] [nu = 334] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 79432] [nf = 7396] [nu = 376] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 4 secs [nr = 87746] [nf = 8313] [nu = 418] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 4 secs [nr = 96060] [nf = 9230] [nu = 460] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 4 secs [nr = 104374] [nf = 10147] [nu = 502] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 5 secs [nr = 112688] [nf = 11064] [nu = 544] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 5 secs [nr = 121002] [nf = 11981] [nu = 586] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 5 secs [nr = 129316] [nf = 12898] [nu = 628] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 6 secs [nr = 137630] [nf = 13815] [nu = 670] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 6 secs [nr = 145944] [nf = 14732] [nu = 712] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 6 secs [nr = 154258] [nf = 15649] [nu = 754] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 7 secs [nr = 162572] [nf = 16566] [nu = 796] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 7 secs [nr = 170886] [nf = 17483] [nu = 838] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 7 secs [nr = 179200] [nf = 18400] [nu = 880] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 8 secs [nr = 187514] [nf = 19317] [nu = 922] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 8 secs [nr = 195828] [nf = 20234] [nu = 964] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 8 secs [nr = 204142] [nf = 21151] [nu = 1006] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 9 secs [nr = 212456] [nf = 22068] [nu = 1048] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 9 secs [nr = 212480] [nf = 22068] [nu = 1048] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 9 secs [nr = 213244] [nf = 22093] [nu = 1049] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 9 secs [nr = 215340] [nf = 22211] [nu = 1050] [ut = 
% 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 9 secs [nr = 230959] [nf = 22959] [nu = 1067] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 10 secs [nr = 299666] [nf = 28114] [nu = 1088] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 15 secs [nr = 717170] [nf = 49975] [nu = 1120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 37 secs [nr = 3336871] [nf = 221006] [nu = 1170] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 177 secs [nr = 17975964] [nf = 1559569] [nu = 1223] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 32852480
% 	resolvents: 29570561	factors: 3281919
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1268
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [2] = 1		
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1268	[2] = 37285	[3] = 481941	[4] = 2247760	[5] = 11961376	[6] = 12248881	
% [7] = 5268258	[8] = 558039	[9] = 43641	[10] = 1589	[11] = 480	[12] = 1072	
% [13] = 666	[14] = 96	[15] = 128	
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c10_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [1] c1_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [2] c2_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [3] c3_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [4] c4_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [5] c5_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [6] c6_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [7] c7_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [8] c8_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [9] c9_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [10] ndr1_0		(+)1	(-)0
% [11] ssSkC0		(+)0	(-)0
% [12] ssSkC1		(+)0	(-)0
% [13] ssSkC10		(+)0	(-)0
% [14] ssSkC11		(+)0	(-)0
% [15] ssSkC12		(+)0	(-)0
% [16] ssSkC13		(+)0	(-)0
% [17] ssSkC14		(+)0	(-)0
% [18] ssSkC15		(+)0	(-)0
% [19] ssSkC16		(+)0	(-)0
% [20] ssSkC17		(+)0	(-)0
% [21] ssSkC18		(+)0	(-)0
% [22] ssSkC19		(+)0	(-)0
% [23] ssSkC2		(+)0	(-)0
% [24] ssSkC20		(+)0	(-)0
% [25] ssSkC21		(+)0	(-)0
% [26] ssSkC22		(+)0	(-)0
% [27] ssSkC23		(+)0	(-)0
% [28] ssSkC24		(+)0	(-)0
% [29] ssSkC25		(+)0	(-)0
% [30] ssSkC26		(+)0	(-)0
% [31] ssSkC27		(+)0	(-)0
% [32] ssSkC28		(+)0	(-)0
% [33] ssSkC29		(+)0	(-)0
% [34] ssSkC3		(+)0	(-)0
% [35] ssSkC30		(+)0	(-)0
% [36] ssSkC31		(+)0	(-)0
% [37] ssSkC32		(+)0	(-)0
% [38] ssSkC33		(+)0	(-)0
% [39] ssSkC34		(+)0	(-)0
% [40] ssSkC35		(+)0	(-)0
% [41] ssSkC36		(+)0	(-)0
% [42] ssSkC37		(+)0	(-)0
% [43] ssSkC38		(+)0	(-)0
% [44] ssSkC4		(+)0	(-)0
% [45] ssSkC5		(+)0	(-)0
% [46] ssSkC6		(+)0	(-)0
% [47] ssSkC7		(+)0	(-)0
% [48] ssSkC8		(+)0	(-)0
% [49] ssSkC9		(+)0	(-)0
% [50] c10_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [51] c1_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [52] c2_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [53] c3_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [54] c4_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [55] c5_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [56] c6_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [57] c7_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [58] c8_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [59] c9_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [60] ndr1_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [61] ssSkP0_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [62] ssSkP1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [63] ssSkP2_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [64] ssSkP3_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [65] ssSkP4_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [66] ssSkP5_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [67] ssSkP6_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [68] ssSkP7_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [69] c10_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [70] c1_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [71] c2_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [72] c3_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [73] c4_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [74] c5_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [75] c6_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [76] c7_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [77] c8_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [78] c9_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)1	(-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 2192169819
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 1392686206
% Number of successful unifications: 32852480
% Number of unification failures: 1831337
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 880699565
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2689762773
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 112
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 291
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 34683817
% ConstructUnitClause() = 113
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 109508
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------