TSTP Solution File: SYN417+1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SYN417+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:00:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.36s 0.62s
% Output : Refutation 0.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 30
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 59 ( 9 unt; 33 nHn; 59 RR)
% Number of literals : 146 ( 145 equ; 51 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,negated_conjecture,
( X != f(g(X))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(X) = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'(X)))
| Y != g(f(Y))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(Y) = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'(Y))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cute) ).
cnf(2,negated_conjecture,
( X != f(g(X))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(X) = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'(X)))
| Y != g(f(Y))
| Y != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cute) ).
cnf(3,negated_conjecture,
( X != f(g(X))
| X != 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(X)
| Y != g(f(Y))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(Y) = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'(Y))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cute) ).
cnf(4,negated_conjecture,
( X != f(g(X))
| X != 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(X)
| Y != g(f(Y))
| Y != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cute) ).
cnf(5,negated_conjecture,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW4')) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cute) ).
cnf(6,negated_conjecture,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| X != g(f(X))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = X ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cute) ).
cnf(8,negated_conjecture,
( X != f(g(X))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = X
| Y != g(f(Y))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = Y ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cute) ).
cnf(9,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| X != f(g(X))
| X != 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(X)
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[4,5,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(11,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| X != f(g(X))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(X) = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'(X)))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[2,5,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(13,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| X != f(g(X))
| X != 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(X)
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4'))) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[3,5,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(15,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| X != f(g(X))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(X) = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'(X)))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4'))) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[1,5,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(17,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| f('SKOLEMAAAW4') != 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(f('SKOLEMAAAW4'))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[9,5,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(18,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(f('SKOLEMAAAW4')) = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'(f('SKOLEMAAAW4'))))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[11,5,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(19,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| f('SKOLEMAAAW4') != 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(f('SKOLEMAAAW4'))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4'))) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,5,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(20,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(f('SKOLEMAAAW4')) = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'(f('SKOLEMAAAW4'))))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4'))) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[15,5,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(21,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(f('SKOLEMAAAW4')) = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'(f('SKOLEMAAAW4'))))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,20]) ).
cnf(26,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(f('SKOLEMAAAW4')) = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'(f('SKOLEMAAAW4')))) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[18,21]) ).
cnf(27,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = g('SKOLEMAAAW1'(f('SKOLEMAAAW4'))) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[6,26,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(42,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| f('SKOLEMAAAW4') = 'SKOLEMAAAW1'(f('SKOLEMAAAW4')) ),
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[26,27,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(43,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4'))) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[19,42]) ).
cnf(45,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[17,42,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(48,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,43]) ).
cnf(54,plain,
'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[45,48]) ).
cnf(55,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' != 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| X != g(f(X))
| X != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(X) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[4,54,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(56,plain,
( X != f(g(X))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = X
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = g('SKOLEMAAAW3') ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,54,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(57,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' != 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| X != g(f(X))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(X) = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'(X))) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[3,54,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(58,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| X != g(f(X))
| X != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(X) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[2,54,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(60,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| X != g(f(X))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(X) = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'(X))) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[1,54,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(64,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' != 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| g('SKOLEMAAAW3') != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[55,54,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(65,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' != 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')) = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')))) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[57,54,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(66,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| g('SKOLEMAAAW3') != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[58,54,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(67,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')) = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')))) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[60,54,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(70,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f('SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = g('SKOLEMAAAW3') ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[56,67,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(71,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| X != f(g(X))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = X
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,67,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(74,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = g('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| g('SKOLEMAAAW3') = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')) ),
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[67,70,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(75,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = g('SKOLEMAAAW3') ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[66,74]) ).
cnf(76,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = g('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[56,75]) ).
cnf(90,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = g('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| g('SKOLEMAAAW3') != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[64,76,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(91,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = g('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')) = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')))) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[65,76]) ).
cnf(95,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = g('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f('SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3'))) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[56,91,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(99,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = g('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| g('SKOLEMAAAW3') = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(g('SKOLEMAAAW3')) ),
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[91,95,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(100,plain,
'SKOLEMAAAW4' = g('SKOLEMAAAW3'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[90,99]) ).
cnf(101,plain,
'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f('SKOLEMAAAW4'),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[54,100,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(106,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' != 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[64,100,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(107,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' != 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4'))) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[65,100,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(108,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[66,100,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(109,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4'))) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[67,100,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(112,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| X != f(g(X))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = X
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[71,100,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(118,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f('SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4'))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[112,109,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(120,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[109,118,theory(equality)]),100,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(121,plain,
'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3') = f(g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3'))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[108,120]) ).
cnf(124,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| X != g(f(X))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = X ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,121,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(138,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')
| 'SKOLEMAAAW4' = g('SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3')) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[124,121,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(139,plain,
'SKOLEMAAAW3' = 'SKOLEMAAAW1'('SKOLEMAAAW3'),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[121,138,theory(equality)]),101,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(142,plain,
'SKOLEMAAAW4' != 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4'),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[106,139,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(143,plain,
'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4') = g(f('SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4'))),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[107,139,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(144,plain,
( X != f(g(X))
| 'SKOLEMAAAW3' = X ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,143,theory(equality)]),142,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(146,plain,
'SKOLEMAAAW3' = f('SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW4')),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[144,143,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(147,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[143,142,100,146,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN417+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 02:42:22 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.48 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 "."
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-12T02:42:22
% 0.20/0.48 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n005.cluster.edu at 2022-07-12T02:42:22
% 0.36/0.62
% 0.36/0.62
% 0.36/0.62 #||
% 0.36/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.62 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/0.63 ||#
% 0.36/0.63
% 0.36/0.63 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.36/0.63 ; 533 formulas have been input or derived (from 75 formulas).
% 0.36/0.63 ; 147 (28%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.36/0.63 ; 137 (93%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.36/0.63 ; 10 ( 7%) are still being kept.
% 0.36/0.63 ;
% 0.36/0.63 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.001 1% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.000 0% Assert (1 call)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.021 15% Process new row (508 calls)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.011 8% Resolution (148 calls)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.010 7% Paramodulation (74 calls)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (21 calls)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.003 2% Condensing (297 calls)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.036 26% Forward subsumption (297 calls)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.005 4% Backward subsumption (137 calls)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.002 1% Clause clause subsumption (259 calls)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.012 9% Forward simplification (429 calls)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.006 4% Backward simplification (147 calls)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.007 5% Ordering (1,065 calls)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.024 17% Other
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.138 Total
% 0.36/0.63 ; 0.147 Real time
% 0.36/0.63 ;
% 0.36/0.63 ; Term-hash-array has 99 terms in all.
% 0.36/0.63 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3 entries (42 at peak, 137 added, 134 deleted).
% 0.36/0.63 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 21 nodes (565 at peak, 2,013 added, 1,992 deleted).
% 0.36/0.63 ; Retrieved 317 possibly forward subsuming rows in 297 calls.
% 0.36/0.63 ; Retrieved 60 possibly backward subsumed rows in 137 calls.
% 0.36/0.63 ; Path-index has 26 entries (63 at peak, 167 added, 141 deleted).
% 0.36/0.63 ; Path-index has 100 nodes (121 at peak, 210 added, 110 deleted).
% 0.36/0.63 ; Trie-index has 26 entries (63 at peak, 167 added, 141 deleted).
% 0.36/0.63 ; Trie-index has 58 nodes (164 at peak, 433 added, 375 deleted).
% 0.36/0.63 ; Retrieved 83 generalization terms in 834 calls.
% 0.36/0.63 ; Retrieved 9 instance terms in 9 calls.
% 0.36/0.63 ; Retrieved 2,654 unifiable terms in 727 calls.
% 0.36/0.63 ;
% 0.36/0.63 ; The agenda of rows to give has 2 entries:
% 0.36/0.63 ; 1 with value (4 21) 1 with value (4 29)
% 0.36/0.63 Evaluation took:
% 0.36/0.63 0.148 seconds of real time
% 0.36/0.63 0.131858 seconds of user run time
% 0.36/0.63 0.016297 seconds of system run time
% 0.36/0.63 [Run times include 0.004 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.36/0.63 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.36/0.63 0 page faults and
% 0.36/0.63 14,692,688 bytes consed.
% 0.36/0.63 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.36/0.63 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-12T02:42:22
% 0.36/0.63 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.36/0.63 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------