TSTP Solution File: SYN414+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN414+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:30:14 EDT 2023
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output : Saturation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_2)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( g(X1)
| g(esk6_1(X4))
| ~ h(X2,X3)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X4,X5)
| ~ f(X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( g(X1)
| h(X4,esk6_1(X4))
| ~ h(X2,X3)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X4,X5)
| ~ f(X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( h(X1,X2)
| h(X4,esk6_1(X4))
| ~ h(X1,X3)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X4,X5)
| ~ f(X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
h(esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0))
| h(X1,X2)
| ~ f(esk4_0)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0))
| h(esk3_0,X1)
| ~ f(esk4_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk4_0)
| h(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( g(esk6_1(esk3_0))
| g(X1)
| ~ f(esk4_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( h(X1,X2)
| g(esk6_1(X4))
| ~ h(X1,X3)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X4,X5)
| ~ f(X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( g(esk6_1(esk3_0))
| h(X1,X2)
| ~ f(esk4_0)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0))
| h(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( g(esk6_1(esk3_0))
| h(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( g(X1)
| h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0))
| ~ f(esk4_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( g(esk6_1(esk3_0))
| h(esk3_0,X1)
| ~ f(esk4_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ h(esk3_0,esk5_0)
| ~ g(esk5_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( ~ h(esk3_0,esk5_0)
| ~ g(esk5_0)
| ~ h(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ g(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk4_0)
| ~ h(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ g(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk2_0)
| ~ h(esk3_0,esk5_0)
| ~ g(esk5_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk4_0)
| f(esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYN414+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:46:37 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iqsU7QrFjR/E---3.1_9500.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # new_bool_3 with pid 9578 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 9582 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # No proof found!
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses : 13
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.19/0.48 # Processed clauses : 60
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...subsumed : 13
% 0.19/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 0.19/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 11
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.19/0.48 # Generated clauses : 64
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 64
% 0.19/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 0.19/0.48 # Paramodulations : 58
% 0.19/0.48 # Factorizations : 6
% 0.19/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 19
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 18
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 28
% 0.19/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 57
% 0.19/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 29
% 0.19/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1987
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.19/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------