TSTP Solution File: SYN414+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN414+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:14:57 EDT 2023
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output : Saturation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_2)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( g(esk6_1(X1))
| ~ f(X2)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X1,X2)
| ~ h(X4,X3) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( h(X1,X2)
| h(X4,esk6_1(X4))
| ~ h(X1,X3)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X4,X5)
| ~ f(X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( h(X1,esk6_1(X1))
| ~ f(X2)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X1,X2)
| ~ h(X1,X3) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
h(esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_6]),c_0_5]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0))
| ~ f(esk4_0)
| ~ f(X1)
| ~ h(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk4_0)
| h(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( g(esk6_1(esk3_0))
| ~ f(esk4_0)
| ~ f(X1)
| ~ h(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( g(X1)
| h(X4,esk6_1(X4))
| ~ h(X2,X3)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X4,X5)
| ~ f(X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( g(X1)
| h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0))
| ~ f(esk4_0)
| ~ f(X2)
| ~ h(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0))
| h(X1,X2)
| ~ f(esk4_0)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0))
| h(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_14]),c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( g(esk6_1(esk3_0))
| h(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_14]),c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk4_0)
| ~ h(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ g(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ h(esk3_0,esk5_0)
| ~ g(esk5_0)
| ~ h(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ g(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ h(esk3_0,esk5_0)
| ~ g(esk5_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk4_0)
| f(esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk2_0)
| ~ h(esk3_0,esk5_0)
| ~ g(esk5_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN414+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 19:01:13 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xgGbQlvuBr/E---3.1_32668.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 304 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 311 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # No proof found!
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses : 13
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.20/0.49 # Processed clauses : 37
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...subsumed : 9
% 0.20/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 28
% 0.20/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.20/0.49 # Generated clauses : 31
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31
% 0.20/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 7
% 0.20/0.49 # Paramodulations : 27
% 0.20/0.49 # Factorizations : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.20/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 47
% 0.20/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 21
% 0.20/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1408
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1768 pages
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------