TSTP Solution File: SYN413+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SYN413+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 03:06:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 1.51s 1.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   76 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   88 (  34   ~;  27   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   3 sgn;  31   !;  14   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0] :
      ? [X1] :
      ! [X2] :
        ( f(X2,X1)
      <=> ( ~ f(X2,X2)
          & f(X2,X0) ) )
   => ~ ? [X3] :
        ! [X4] : f(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kalish256) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0] :
        ? [X1] :
        ! [X2] :
          ( f(X2,X1)
        <=> ( ~ f(X2,X2)
            & f(X2,X0) ) )
     => ~ ? [X3] :
          ! [X4] : f(X4,X3) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
      ! [X4] : f(X4,X3)
    & ! [X0] :
      ? [X1] :
      ! [X2] :
        ( f(X2,X1)
      <=> ( ~ f(X2,X2)
          & f(X2,X0) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
      ! [X4] : f(X4,X3)
    & ! [X0] :
      ? [X1] :
      ! [X2] :
        ( ( f(X2,X1)
          | f(X2,X2)
          | ~ f(X2,X0) )
        & ( ( ~ f(X2,X2)
            & f(X2,X0) )
          | ~ f(X2,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
      ! [X4] : f(X4,X3)
    & ! [X0] :
      ? [X1] :
      ! [X2] :
        ( ( f(X2,X1)
          | f(X2,X2)
          | ~ f(X2,X0) )
        & ( ( ~ f(X2,X2)
            & f(X2,X0) )
          | ~ f(X2,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] : f(X1,X0)
    & ! [X2] :
      ? [X3] :
      ! [X4] :
        ( ( f(X4,X3)
          | f(X4,X4)
          | ~ f(X4,X2) )
        & ( ( ~ f(X4,X4)
            & f(X4,X2) )
          | ~ f(X4,X3) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] : f(X1,X0)
   => ! [X1] : f(X1,sK0) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ? [X3] :
        ! [X4] :
          ( ( f(X4,X3)
            | f(X4,X4)
            | ~ f(X4,X2) )
          & ( ( ~ f(X4,X4)
              & f(X4,X2) )
            | ~ f(X4,X3) ) )
     => ! [X4] :
          ( ( f(X4,sK1(X2))
            | f(X4,X4)
            | ~ f(X4,X2) )
          & ( ( ~ f(X4,X4)
              & f(X4,X2) )
            | ~ f(X4,sK1(X2)) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( ! [X1] : f(X1,sK0)
    & ! [X2,X4] :
        ( ( f(X4,sK1(X2))
          | f(X4,X4)
          | ~ f(X4,X2) )
        & ( ( ~ f(X4,X4)
            & f(X4,X2) )
          | ~ f(X4,sK1(X2)) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X2,X4] :
      ( ~ f(X4,X4)
      | ~ f(X4,sK1(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X2,X4] :
      ( f(X4,sK1(X2))
      | f(X4,X4)
      | ~ f(X4,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X1] : f(X1,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    f(X0,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ f(X0,X1)
    | f(X0,sK1(X1))
    | f(X0,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ f(X0,sK1(X1))
    | ~ f(X0,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

cnf(c_73,plain,
    ( ~ f(sK1(X0),X1)
    | f(sK1(X0),sK1(X0))
    | f(sK1(X0),sK1(X1)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

cnf(c_74,plain,
    ~ f(sK1(X0),sK1(X0)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

cnf(c_75,plain,
    ( ~ f(sK1(sK0),sK0)
    | f(sK1(sK0),sK1(sK0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_73]) ).

cnf(c_76,plain,
    ~ f(sK1(sK0),sK1(sK0)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_74]) ).

cnf(c_83,plain,
    f(sK1(X0),sK0),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

cnf(c_84,plain,
    f(sK1(sK0),sK0),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_83]) ).

cnf(c_85,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_76,c_75]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SYN413+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 20:04:56 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.51/1.16  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.51/1.16  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  ------  iProver source info
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.51/1.16  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.51/1.16  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.51/1.16  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  ------ Parsing...
% 1.51/1.16  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.51/1.16  ------ Proving...
% 1.51/1.16  ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  clauses                                 4
% 1.51/1.16  conjectures                             4
% 1.51/1.16  EPR                                     1
% 1.51/1.16  Horn                                    3
% 1.51/1.16  unary                                   1
% 1.51/1.16  binary                                  2
% 1.51/1.16  lits                                    8
% 1.51/1.16  lits eq                                 0
% 1.51/1.16  fd_pure                                 0
% 1.51/1.16  fd_pseudo                               0
% 1.51/1.16  fd_cond                                 0
% 1.51/1.16  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 1.51/1.16  AC symbols                              0
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  ------ 
% 1.51/1.16  Current options:
% 1.51/1.16  ------ 
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  ------ Proving...
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.51/1.16  
% 1.51/1.16  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.65/1.16  
% 1.65/1.16  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------