%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SYN407+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 09:29:49 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.87s
% Output   : Solution 0.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP32326/SYN407+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP32326/SYN407+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP32326/SYN407+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 32422
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time   : 0.008 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, conjecture,(![X1]:(f(X1)=>(g(X1)|h(X1)))=>(![X2]:(f(X2)=>g(X2))|?[X3]:(f(X3)&h(X3)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', kalish241)).
% fof(2, negated_conjecture,~((![X1]:(f(X1)=>(g(X1)|h(X1)))=>(![X2]:(f(X2)=>g(X2))|?[X3]:(f(X3)&h(X3))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[1])).
% fof(3, negated_conjecture,(![X1]:(~(f(X1))|(g(X1)|h(X1)))&(?[X2]:(f(X2)&~(g(X2)))&![X3]:(~(f(X3))|~(h(X3))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(4, negated_conjecture,(![X4]:(~(f(X4))|(g(X4)|h(X4)))&(?[X5]:(f(X5)&~(g(X5)))&![X6]:(~(f(X6))|~(h(X6))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(5, negated_conjecture,(![X4]:(~(f(X4))|(g(X4)|h(X4)))&((f(esk1_0)&~(g(esk1_0)))&![X6]:(~(f(X6))|~(h(X6))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[4])).
% fof(6, negated_conjecture,![X4]:![X6]:(((~(f(X6))|~(h(X6)))&(f(esk1_0)&~(g(esk1_0))))&(~(f(X4))|(g(X4)|h(X4)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[5])).
% cnf(7,negated_conjecture,(h(X1)|g(X1)|~f(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[6])).
% cnf(8,negated_conjecture,(~g(esk1_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[6])).
% cnf(9,negated_conjecture,(f(esk1_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[6])).
% cnf(10,negated_conjecture,(~h(X1)|~f(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[6])).
% cnf(11,negated_conjecture,(g(X1)|~f(X1)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[7,10])).
% cnf(12,negated_conjecture,(~f(esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[8,11,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(13,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[12,9,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(14,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[13,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(15,negated_conjecture,($false),14,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                : 7
% # ...of these trivial              : 0
% # ...subsumed                      : 0
% # ...remaining for further processing: 7
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                : 0
% # Backward-rewritten               : 0
% # Generated clauses                : 1
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% # Contextual simplify-reflections  : 1
% # Paramodulations                  : 1
% # Factorizations                   : 0
% # Equation resolutions             : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 3
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 1
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses         : 1
% #    Non-unit-clauses              : 1
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% # ...number of literals in the above : 2
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound: 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts      : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes     : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index:     6 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:            2 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:            4 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time            : 0.007 s
% # System time          : 0.002 s
% # Total time           : 0.009 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.16 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.16 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP32326/SYN407+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------