TSTP Solution File: SYN407+1 by Goeland---1.0.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem  : SYN407+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:23:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.35s
% Output   : Proof 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SYN407+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  5 02:56:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.34  [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.12/0.34  [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.12/0.34  [0.000040s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  Start search
% 0.12/0.34  nb_step : 1 - limit : 3
% 0.12/0.34  Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.18/0.35  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.35  [0] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~(! [X3_3] :  ((f(X3_3) => (g(X3_3) | h(X3_3)))) => (! [Y4_4] :  ((f(Y4_4) => g(Y4_4))) | ? [Z5_5] :  ((f(Z5_5) & h(Z5_5)))))
% 0.18/0.35  	-> [1] ! [X3_3] :  ((f(X3_3) => (g(X3_3) | h(X3_3)))), ~(! [Y4_4] :  ((f(Y4_4) => g(Y4_4))) | ? [Z5_5] :  ((f(Z5_5) & h(Z5_5))))
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  [1] ALPHA_NOT_OR : ~(! [Y4_4] :  ((f(Y4_4) => g(Y4_4))) | ? [Z5_5] :  ((f(Z5_5) & h(Z5_5))))
% 0.18/0.35  	-> [2] ~! [Y4_4] :  ((f(Y4_4) => g(Y4_4))), ~? [Z5_5] :  ((f(Z5_5) & h(Z5_5)))
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  [2] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [Y4_4] :  ((f(Y4_4) => g(Y4_4)))
% 0.18/0.35  	-> [3] ~(f(skolem_Y44) => g(skolem_Y44))
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  [3] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~(f(skolem_Y44) => g(skolem_Y44))
% 0.18/0.35  	-> [4] f(skolem_Y44), ~g(skolem_Y44)
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  [4] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X3_3] :  ((f(X3_3) => (g(X3_3) | h(X3_3))))
% 0.18/0.35  	-> [5] (f(skolem_Y44) => (g(skolem_Y44) | h(skolem_Y44)))
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  [5] BETA_IMPLY : (f(skolem_Y44) => (g(skolem_Y44) | h(skolem_Y44)))
% 0.18/0.35  	-> [6] ~f(skolem_Y44)
% 0.18/0.35  	-> [7] (g(skolem_Y44) | h(skolem_Y44))
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  [6] CLOSURE : ~f(skolem_Y44)
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  [7] BETA_OR : (g(skolem_Y44) | h(skolem_Y44))
% 0.18/0.35  	-> [8] g(skolem_Y44)
% 0.18/0.35  	-> [9] h(skolem_Y44)
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  [8] CLOSURE : g(skolem_Y44)
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  [9] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [Z5_5] :  ((f(Z5_5) & h(Z5_5)))
% 0.18/0.35  	-> [10] ~(f(skolem_Y44) & h(skolem_Y44))
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  [10] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(f(skolem_Y44) & h(skolem_Y44))
% 0.18/0.35  	-> [11] ~f(skolem_Y44)
% 0.18/0.35  	-> [12] ~h(skolem_Y44)
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  [11] CLOSURE : ~f(skolem_Y44)
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  [12] CLOSURE : ~h(skolem_Y44)
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.35  [0.009773s][1][Res] 28 goroutines created
% 0.18/0.35  ==== Result ====
% 0.18/0.35  [0.009805s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.18/0.35  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------