TSTP Solution File: SYN406+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SYN406+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 01:45:38 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 0.79s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.21  % Problem    : SYN406+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.04/0.22  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.08/0.42  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.42  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.42  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.42  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.42  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.42  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 18:08:33 EDT 2023
% 0.08/0.43  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.37/0.76  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.37/0.78  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.78  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.37/0.78  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.37/0.78  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.37/0.78  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.37/0.78  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.37/0.78  
% 0.37/0.78  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.37/0.78  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.37/0.78  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.79  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.79  % File     : SYN406+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.37/0.79  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.37/0.79  % Problem  : Kalish and Montague Problem 240
% 0.37/0.79  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.37/0.79  % English  : Laws of alphabetic variance.
% 0.37/0.79  
% 0.37/0.79  % Refs     : [KM64]  Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal
% 0.37/0.79  %          : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.37/0.79  % Source   : [Hah94]
% 0.37/0.79  % Names    : kalish240 [Hah94]
% 0.37/0.79  
% 0.37/0.79  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.37/0.79  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.37/0.79  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.37/0.79  %            Number of atoms       :    6 (   0 equ)
% 0.37/0.79  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.37/0.79  %            Number of connectives :    5 (   0   ~;   0   |;   3   &)
% 0.37/0.79  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.37/0.79  %            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   5 avg)
% 0.37/0.79  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.37/0.79  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.37/0.79  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.37/0.79  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   1   !;   2   ?)
% 0.37/0.79  % SPC      : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 0.37/0.79  
% 0.37/0.79  % Comments :
% 0.37/0.79  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.79  fof(kalish240,conjecture,
% 0.37/0.79      ( ( ! [X] :
% 0.37/0.79            ( f(X)
% 0.37/0.79           => g(X) )
% 0.37/0.79        & ? [Y] :
% 0.37/0.79            ( f(Y)
% 0.37/0.79            & h(Y) ) )
% 0.37/0.79     => ? [Z] :
% 0.37/0.79          ( g(Z)
% 0.37/0.79          & h(Z) ) ) ).
% 0.37/0.79  
% 0.37/0.79  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.79  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.79  % Proof found
% 0.37/0.79  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.37/0.79  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.37/0.81  %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.37/0.81  %VarNum:4(SingletonVarNum:2)
% 0.37/0.81  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.37/0.81  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.37/0.81  %SharedTerms:3
% 0.37/0.81  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4
% 0.37/0.81  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.37/0.81  [1]P1(a1)
% 0.37/0.81  [2]P2(a1)
% 0.37/0.81  [3]~P1(x31)+P3(x31)
% 0.37/0.81  [4]~P2(x41)+~P3(x41)
% 0.37/0.81  %EqnAxiom
% 0.37/0.81  
% 0.37/0.81  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.83  cnf(6,plain,
% 0.37/0.83     ($false),
% 0.37/0.83     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,3]),
% 0.37/0.83     ['proof']).
% 0.37/0.83  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.37/0.83  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------