%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : SYN403+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 01:51:37 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   4 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (   7   ~;   4   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   0 sgn;   2   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    f: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    g: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    h: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

fof(kalish234,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ( f(X1)
         => g(X1) )
        & ( g(X1)
         => h(X1) ) )
     => ( f(X1)
       => h(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kalish234) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ( f(X1)
           => g(X1) )
          & ( g(X1)
           => h(X1) ) )
       => ( f(X1)
         => h(X1) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[kalish234]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ f(esk1_0)
      | g(esk1_0) )
    & ( ~ g(esk1_0)
      | h(esk1_0) )
    & f(esk1_0)
    & ~ h(esk1_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( g(esk1_0)
    | ~ f(esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    f(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( h(esk1_0)
    | ~ g(esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    g(esk1_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ h(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYN403+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 20:51:44 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.56  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.57  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.21/0.57  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.57  % Proof found
% 0.21/0.57  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.57  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.57  % Total time : 0.003000 s
% 0.21/0.57  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.57  % Total time : 0.005000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------