%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SYN402+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:26:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   6   ~;   0   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   7   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f7,f6]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ f(X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( f(sK0)
    & ! [X1] : ~ f(X1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f3,f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( f(X0)
        & ! [X1] : ~ f(X1) )
   => ( f(sK0)
      & ! [X1] : ~ f(X1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( f(X0)
      & ! [X1] : ~ f(X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( f(X0)
       => ? [X1] : f(X1) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( f(X0)
     => ? [X1] : f(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kalish230) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    f(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11  % Problem    : SYN402+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.09/0.11  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 22:03:59 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.47  % (11881)dis+1010_2:3_fs=off:fsr=off:nm=0:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2agt=32:i=82:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/82Mi)
% 0.17/0.47  % (11864)dis+21_1:1_av=off:sos=on:sp=frequency:ss=included:to=lpo:i=15:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/15Mi)
% 0.17/0.47  % (11864)First to succeed.
% 0.17/0.47  % (11864)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.17/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.47  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.47  % (11864)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.47  % (11864)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.17/0.47  % (11864)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.17/0.47  % (11864)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.17/0.47  
% 0.17/0.47  % (11864)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.17/0.47  % (11864)Time elapsed: 0.095 s
% 0.17/0.47  % (11864)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.17/0.47  % (11864)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.47  % (11864)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.47  % (11858)Success in time 0.147 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------