TSTP Solution File: SYN399+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYN399+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --ignore_missing on --mode portfolio/casc [--schedule casc_hol_2020] -p tptp -om szs -t %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 03:39:49 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.42s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   1 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   87 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   96 (  37   ~;  33   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   9 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   6 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (;  21   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f35,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f21,f25,f26,f30,f32,f34]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f29,f24]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( ! [X1] : f(X1)
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( spl1_3
  <=> ! [X1] : f(X1) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_3])]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( ! [X2] : ~ f(X2)
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( spl1_4
  <=> ! [X2] : ~ f(X2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_4])]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ( spl1_1
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl1_1
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f16,f24]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( ~ f(sK0)
    | spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( spl1_1
  <=> f(sK0) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( spl1_4
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f9,f18,f28]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ( spl1_2
  <=> p ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( p
      | ~ f(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ( ( ~ p
      | ~ f(sK0) )
    & ( p
      | ! [X1] : f(X1) )
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ( f(X2)
          | ~ p )
        & ( p
          | ~ f(X2) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f6,f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : ~ f(X0)
   => ~ f(sK0) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ( ~ p
      | ? [X0] : ~ f(X0) )
    & ( p
      | ! [X1] : f(X1) )
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ( f(X2)
          | ~ p )
        & ( p
          | ~ f(X2) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ( ~ p
      | ? [X1] : ~ f(X1) )
    & ( p
      | ! [X1] : f(X1) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( ( f(X0)
          | ~ p )
        & ( p
          | ~ f(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ( ~ p
      | ? [X1] : ~ f(X1) )
    & ( p
      | ! [X1] : f(X1) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( ( f(X0)
          | ~ p )
        & ( p
          | ~ f(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ( ( ! [X1] : f(X1)
    <~> p )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( f(X0)
      <=> p ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0] :
          ( f(X0)
        <=> p )
     => ( ! [X1] : f(X1)
      <=> p ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( f(X0)
      <=> p )
   => ( ! [X1] : f(X1)
    <=> p ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6oUq7MIwuA/Vampire---4.8_21285',kalish223) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_2
    | spl1_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f10,f23,f18]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( f(X2)
      | ~ p ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( spl1_3
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f18,f23]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( p
      | f(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_1
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f12,f18,f14]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( ~ p
    | ~ f(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SYN399+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : vampire --ignore_missing on --mode portfolio/casc [--schedule casc_hol_2020] -p tptp -om szs -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 17:22:53 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  This is a FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ problem
% 0.14/0.35  Running vampire_casc2023 --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6oUq7MIwuA/Vampire---4.8_21285
% 0.14/0.36  % (21396)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.20/0.42  % (21399)lrs+11_4:3_aac=none:add=off:amm=off:anc=none:bd=preordered:bs=on:bce=on:flr=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=none:nwc=2.5:sims=off:sp=reverse_arity:tgt=full:stl=188_1106 on Vampire---4 for (1106ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.42  % (21401)ott-1010_5_add=off:amm=off:anc=none:bce=on:cond=fast:flr=on:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sp=occurrence:tgt=ground_470 on Vampire---4 for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.42  % (21400)dis-1_128_add=large:amm=sco:anc=all_dependent:bs=on:bsr=on:bce=on:cond=fast:fsr=off:gsp=on:gs=on:gsem=off:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=32:nwc=4.0:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_692 on Vampire---4 for (692ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.42  % (21397)lrs-1_7_acc=on:amm=off:anc=all:bs=on:bsr=on:cond=fast:flr=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:lcm=reverse:lma=on:msp=off:nm=0:nwc=1.2:sp=frequency:stl=188_1354 on Vampire---4 for (1354ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.42  % (21403)dis+3_1024_av=off:fsr=off:gsp=on:lcm=predicate:nm=4:sos=all:sp=weighted_frequency_338 on Vampire---4 for (338ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.42  % (21401)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.42  % (21398)dis-1002_1_av=off:bsr=on:cond=on:flr=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nwc=2.0:sims=off_1218 on Vampire---4 for (1218ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.42  % (21403)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.42  % (21402)ott+10_8_br=off:cond=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=3.0:sims=off:sp=reverse_frequency:urr=on_415 on Vampire---4 for (415ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.42  % (21397)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.42  % (21401)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.42  % (21401)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.42  % (21401)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 05ef610bd on 2023-06-21 19:03:17 +0100)
% 0.20/0.42  % (21401)Linked with Z3 4.9.1.0 6ed071b44407cf6623b8d3c0dceb2a8fb7040cee z3-4.8.4-6427-g6ed071b44
% 0.20/0.42  % (21401)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  % (21401)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.20/0.42  % (21401)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.42  % (21401)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.42  % (21401)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.42  % (21396)Success in time 0.062 s
% 0.20/0.42  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------