TSTP Solution File: SYN398+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN398+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:45:36 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN398+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.17/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:22:42 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.54 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 % File : SYN398+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.20/0.59 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.20/0.59 % Problem : Kalish and Montague Problem 215
% 0.20/0.59 % Version : Especial.
% 0.20/0.59 % English : Laws of confinement.
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 % Refs : [KM64] Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal
% 0.20/0.59 % : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.59 % Source : [Hah94]
% 0.20/0.59 % Names : kalish215 [Hah94]
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 % Status : Theorem
% 0.20/0.59 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.20/0.59 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 1 ( 0 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.59 % Number of atoms : 4 ( 0 equ)
% 0.20/0.59 % Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 4 avg)
% 0.20/0.59 % Number of connectives : 3 ( 0 ~; 0 |; 2 &)
% 0.20/0.59 % ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.59 % Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 4 avg)
% 0.20/0.59 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.59 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% 0.20/0.59 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% 0.20/0.59 % Number of variables : 2 ( 2 !; 0 ?)
% 0.20/0.59 % SPC : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.59 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 fof(kalish215,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.59 ( ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.59 ( p
% 0.20/0.59 & f(X) )
% 0.20/0.59 <=> ( p
% 0.20/0.59 & ! [Y] : f(Y) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.59 %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.59 %VarNum:2(SingletonVarNum:2)
% 0.20/0.59 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.20/0.59 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.20/0.59 %SharedTerms:7
% 0.20/0.59 %goalClause: 1 4 5
% 0.20/0.59 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.59 [1]P1(a500)
% 0.20/0.59 [4]P2(x41)+P2(x42)
% 0.20/0.59 [5]~P1(a500)+~P2(a1)+~P2(a2)
% 0.20/0.59 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(6,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 (~P2(a2)+~P2(a1)),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5])).
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(7,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 (~P2(a1)),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,6])).
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(9,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 ($false),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[7,4]),
% 0.20/0.60 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------