TSTP Solution File: SYN396+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SYN396+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 18:03:10 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.36s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   1 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   66 (  31   ~;  22   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   6 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (  15   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f35,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f20,f21,f30,f32,f34]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f29,f19]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : f(X0)
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ! [X0] : f(X0) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( ~ f(sK0)
    | spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ( spl3_4
  <=> f(sK0) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_4])]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f25,f19]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( ~ f(sK1)
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> f(sK1) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f9,f27,f23]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( ~ f(sK0)
    | ~ f(sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0] : f(X0)
      | ! [X1] : f(X1) )
    & ( ~ f(sK0)
      | ~ f(sK1) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f5,f7,f6]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X2] : ~ f(X2)
   => ~ f(sK0) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X3] : ~ f(X3)
   => ~ f(sK1) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0] : f(X0)
      | ! [X1] : f(X1) )
    & ( ? [X2] : ~ f(X2)
      | ? [X3] : ~ f(X3) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ( ! [X1] : f(X1)
      | ! [X0] : f(X0) )
    & ( ? [X1] : ~ f(X1)
      | ? [X0] : ~ f(X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : ~ f(X0)
  <~> ? [X1] : ~ f(X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ! [X0] : f(X0)
    <=> ? [X1] : ~ f(X1) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ~ ! [X0] : f(X0)
  <=> ? [X1] : ~ f(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kalish203) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f12,f18,f14]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> sP2 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( f(X1)
      | ~ sP2 ),
    inference(general_splitting,[],[f10,f11_D]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( f(X0)
      | sP2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11_D]) ).

fof(f11_D,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : f(X0)
  <=> ~ sP2 ),
    introduced(general_splitting_component_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP2])]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( f(X0)
      | f(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f18,f14]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SYN396+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 01:51:27 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  % (18209)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.36  % (18212)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.36  % (18212)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.36  % (18212)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.36  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.36  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.36  % (18212)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (18212)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.14/0.36  % (18212)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  % (18212)Memory used [KB]: 749
% 0.14/0.36  % (18212)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.36  % (18212)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.36  % (18212)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (18212)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (18209)Success in time 0.011 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------