TSTP Solution File: SYN396+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN396+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:10:45 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.08s 1.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  14 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (  11   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    1 (   1   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (;   9   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ f > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(f,type,
    f: $i > $o ).

tff(f_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ! [X] : f(X)
    <=> ? [Y] : ~ f(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kalish203) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [Y_1,X_2] :
      ( f(Y_1)
      | f(X_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_11,plain,
    ! [X_2] : f(X_2),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_2]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X_2] :
      ( ~ f('#skF_1')
      | f(X_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ~ f('#skF_1'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_4]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_11,c_10]) ).

tff(c_17,plain,
    ! [Y_1] : f(Y_1),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_2]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_17,c_10]) ).

tff(c_23,plain,
    ! [X_2] : f(X_2),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_4]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ( ~ f('#skF_1')
    | ~ f('#skF_2') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_9,plain,
    ~ f('#skF_2'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_8]) ).

tff(c_27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_23,c_9]) ).

tff(c_29,plain,
    f('#skF_2'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_8]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [Y_1] :
      ( f(Y_1)
      | ~ f('#skF_2') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ~ f('#skF_2'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_6]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_29,c_30]) ).

tff(c_33,plain,
    ! [Y_1] : f(Y_1),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_6]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ~ f('#skF_1'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_8]) ).

tff(c_39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_33,c_28]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SYN396+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:15:12 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.08/1.44  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/1.45  
% 2.08/1.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.08/1.49  
% 2.08/1.49  Inference rules
% 2.08/1.49  ----------------------
% 2.08/1.49  #Ref     : 0
% 2.08/1.49  #Sup     : 0
% 2.08/1.49  #Fact    : 0
% 2.08/1.49  #Define  : 0
% 2.08/1.49  #Split   : 4
% 2.08/1.49  #Chain   : 0
% 2.08/1.49  #Close   : 0
% 2.08/1.49  
% 2.08/1.49  Ordering : KBO
% 2.08/1.49  
% 2.08/1.49  Simplification rules
% 2.08/1.49  ----------------------
% 2.08/1.49  #Subsume      : 1
% 2.08/1.49  #Demod        : 9
% 2.08/1.49  #Tautology    : 2
% 2.08/1.49  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.08/1.49  #BackRed      : 5
% 2.08/1.49  
% 2.08/1.49  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.08/1.49  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.08/1.49  
% 2.08/1.49  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.08/1.49  ----------------------
% 2.08/1.49  Preprocessing        : 0.35
% 2.08/1.49  Parsing              : 0.19
% 2.08/1.49  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.08/1.49  Main loop            : 0.12
% 2.08/1.49  Inferencing          : 0.03
% 2.08/1.49  Reduction            : 0.02
% 2.08/1.49  Demodulation         : 0.02
% 2.08/1.49  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.08/1.49  Subsumption          : 0.03
% 2.08/1.49  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.08/1.49  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.08/1.49  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.08/1.49  Total                : 0.52
% 2.08/1.49  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.08/1.49  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.08/1.49  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.08/1.49  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------