TSTP Solution File: SYN395+1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SYN395+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:44:37 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   6   ~;   2   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   2 sgn   4   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kalish202,conjecture,
    ( ! [X1] :
        ( f(X1)
       => g(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] : f(X2)
     => ? [X3] : g(X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kalish202) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X1] :
          ( f(X1)
         => g(X1) )
     => ( ? [X2] : f(X2)
       => ? [X3] : g(X3) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[kalish202]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4,X6] :
      ( ( ~ f(X4)
        | g(X4) )
      & f(esk1_0)
      & ~ g(X6) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( g(X1)
    | ~ f(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ g(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    f(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ f(X1),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.07  % Problem    : SYN395+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.07  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.06/0.26  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.26  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.26  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.26  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 13:50:07 EDT 2024
% 0.06/0.26  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.34  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.34  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.34  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.11/0.34  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.34  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.34  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.34  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.34  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.34  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.34  # new_bool_3 with pid 11542 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.11/0.34  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.34  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.34  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.34  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.34  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.34  # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.34  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.34  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.34  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 11545 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.11/0.34  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.34  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.34  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.34  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.34  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.34  # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.34  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.34  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.34  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.34  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  # Proof found!
% 0.11/0.34  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.34  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.34  # Parsed axioms                        : 1
% 0.11/0.34  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.11/0.34  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.11/0.34  # Processed clauses                    : 3
% 0.11/0.34  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # ...remaining for further processing  : 3
% 0.11/0.34  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.11/0.34  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.34  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.34  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.34  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.34  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.34  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.34  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.34  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.34  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.34  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.34  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.34  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.34  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.11/0.34  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.11/0.34  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.34  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.11/0.34  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.34  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.11/0.34  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.34  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 154
% 0.11/0.34  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 61
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.34  # User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.34  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.34  # Total time               : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.34  # Maximum resident set size: 1588 pages
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.34  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.34  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.34  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.34  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.11/0.34  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.11/0.35  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------