TSTP Solution File: SYN394+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SYN394+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 23:55:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.38s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SYN394+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Sep  5 02:51:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.12/0.34  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.12/0.34    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.12/0.34    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.12/0.34    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.12/0.34    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.12/0.34    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.12/0.34    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.12/0.34    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.12/0.34    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.12/0.34    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.12/0.38  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.38  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.12/0.38  tff(f_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.38     f: $i > $o)).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(tptp_fun_Z_0_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.38     tptp_fun_Z_0: $i)).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(g_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.38     g: $i > $o)).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(1,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (^[X: $i] : refl((g(X) | (~f(X))) <=> (g(X) | (~f(X))))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(2,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X))) <=> ![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[1])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(3,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X))) <=> ![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(4,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      ((~(![X: $i] : (f(X) => g(X)) => (![Y: $i] : f(Y) => ![Z: $i] : g(Z)))) <=> (~(![Z: $i] : g(Z) | (~![Y: $i] : f(Y)) | (~![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X))))))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(5,axiom,(~(![X: $i] : (f(X) => g(X)) => (![Y: $i] : f(Y) => ![Z: $i] : g(Z)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','kalish201')).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(6,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~(![Z: $i] : g(Z) | (~![Y: $i] : f(Y)) | (~![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X)))))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[5, 4])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(7,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(8,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 3])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(9,plain,(
% 0.12/0.38      ![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[8])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(10,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 2])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(11,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      ((~![Z: $i] : g(Z)) <=> (~![Z: $i] : g(Z))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(12,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Z: $i] : g(Z)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(13,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Z: $i] : g(Z)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[12, 11])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(14,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Z: $i] : g(Z)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[13, 11])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(15,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Z: $i] : g(Z)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[14, 11])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(16,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Z: $i] : g(Z)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[15, 11])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(17,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Z: $i] : g(Z)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[16, 11])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(18,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Z: $i] : g(Z)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[17, 11])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(19,plain,(
% 0.12/0.38      ~g(Z!0)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[18])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(20,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (((~![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X)))) | (g(Z!0) | (~f(Z!0)))) <=> ((~![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X)))) | g(Z!0) | (~f(Z!0)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(21,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      ((~![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X)))) | (g(Z!0) | (~f(Z!0)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(22,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      ((~![X: $i] : (g(X) | (~f(X)))) | g(Z!0) | (~f(Z!0))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[21, 20])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(23,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~f(Z!0)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[22, 19, 10])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(24,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (^[Y: $i] : refl(f(Y) <=> f(Y))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(25,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (![Y: $i] : f(Y) <=> ![Y: $i] : f(Y)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[24])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(26,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (![Y: $i] : f(Y) <=> ![Y: $i] : f(Y)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(27,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (![Y: $i] : f(Y)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(28,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (![Y: $i] : f(Y)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[27, 26])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(29,plain,(
% 0.12/0.38      ![Y: $i] : f(Y)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[28])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(30,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (![Y: $i] : f(Y)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[29, 25])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(31,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      ((~![Y: $i] : f(Y)) | f(Z!0)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(32,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      ($false),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[31, 30, 23])).
% 0.12/0.38  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------