TSTP Solution File: SYN391+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SYN391+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:24:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.85s 2.02s
% Output   : Refutation 1.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   3 unt;   1 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   0 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   3 prp; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ p1
    | p2 ),
    file('SYN391+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( p1
    | ~ p2 ),
    file('SYN391+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,plain,
    ( ~ p2
    | p1 ),
    inference(propositional,[status(thm)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[2])]),
    [iquote('copy,2,propositional')] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ p1
    | ~ p2 ),
    file('SYN391+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( p1
    | p2 ),
    file('SYN391+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,plain,
    p1,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[5,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,5,3')] ).

cnf(7,plain,
    p2,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[6,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,6,1')] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[7,4,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,7,4,6')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN391+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 11:19:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.85/2.02  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.85/2.02  The process was started by sandbox2 on n025.cluster.edu,
% 1.85/2.02  Wed Jul 27 11:19:15 2022
% 1.85/2.02  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 27147.
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.85/2.02  set(auto).
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.85/2.02  clear(print_given).
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  formula_list(usable).
% 1.85/2.02  -((p1|p2)& (-p1|p2)& (p1| -p2)-> -(-p1| -p2)).
% 1.85/2.02  end_of_list.
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  list(usable).
% 1.85/2.02  0 [] p1|p2.
% 1.85/2.02  0 [] -p1|p2.
% 1.85/2.02  0 [] p1| -p2.
% 1.85/2.02  0 [] -p1| -p2.
% 1.85/2.02  end_of_list.
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  SCAN INPUT: prop=1, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  The clause set is propositional; the strategy will be
% 1.85/2.02  ordered hyperresolution with the propositional
% 1.85/2.02  optimizations, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: set(propositional).
% 1.85/2.02     dependent: set(sort_literals).
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  ------------> process usable:
% 1.85/2.02  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 1 [] -p1|p2.
% 1.85/2.02  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 3 [copy,2,propositional] -p2|p1.
% 1.85/2.02  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 4 [] -p1| -p2.
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  ------------> process sos:
% 1.85/2.02  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 5 [] p1|p2.
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 8 [hyper,7,4,6] $F.
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.85/2.02  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.85/2.02  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.85/2.02  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  ============ end of search ============
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.85/2.02  clauses given                  3
% 1.85/2.02  clauses generated              3
% 1.85/2.02  clauses kept                   6
% 1.85/2.02  clauses forward subsumed       0
% 1.85/2.02  clauses back subsumed          3
% 1.85/2.02  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.85/2.02  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.85/2.02  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.85/2.02  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.85/2.02  
% 1.85/2.02  Process 27147 finished Wed Jul 27 11:19:17 2022
% 1.85/2.02  Otter interrupted
% 1.85/2.02  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------