TSTP Solution File: SYN386+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SYN386+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:18:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.43s 0.99s
% Output   : Refutation 0.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN386+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 13:12:07 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.43/0.99  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.43/0.99  Process 25178 was started by sandbox2 on n004.cluster.edu,
% 0.43/0.99  Mon Jul 11 13:12:08 2022
% 0.43/0.99  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_25016_n004.cluster.edu".
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_25016_n004.cluster.edu
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.43/0.99  set(auto2).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.43/0.99      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.43/0.99      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.43/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.99  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.43/0.99  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.43/0.99  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.43/0.99  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.43/0.99  clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (1 formulas)
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.43/0.99  1 -((all X exists Y big_f(X,Y)) & (exists X all E exists N all W (big_s(N,W) -> big_d(W,X,E))) & (all E exists D all A all B (big_d(A,B,D) -> (all Y all Z (big_f(A,Y) & big_f(B,Z) -> big_d(Y,Z,E))))) -> (exists Y all E exists M all W (big_s(M,W) -> (all Z (big_f(W,Z) -> big_d(Z,Y,E)))))) # label(x2138) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.43/0.99  2 -big_s(f2(A),B) | big_d(B,c1,A) # label(x2138) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.43/0.99  3 big_s(A,f5(B,A)) # label(x2138) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.43/0.99  Derived: big_d(f5(A,f2(B)),c1,B).  [resolve(2,a,3,a)].
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  Auto_denials:
% 0.43/0.99    % copying label x2138 to answer in negative clause
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.43/0.99  Function symbol KB weights:  c1=1. f5=1. f6=1. f1=1. f2=1. f3=1. f4=1.
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.43/0.99  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.43/0.99  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: x2138.
% 0.43/0.99  % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.43/0.99  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.43/0.99  % Maximum clause weight is 15.000.
% 0.43/0.99  % Given clauses 5.
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  1 -((all X exists Y big_f(X,Y)) & (exists X all E exists N all W (big_s(N,W) -> big_d(W,X,E))) & (all E exists D all A all B (big_d(A,B,D) -> (all Y all Z (big_f(A,Y) & big_f(B,Z) -> big_d(Y,Z,E))))) -> (exists Y all E exists M all W (big_s(M,W) -> (all Z (big_f(W,Z) -> big_d(Z,Y,E)))))) # label(x2138) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  2 -big_s(f2(A),B) | big_d(B,c1,A) # label(x2138) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.43/0.99  3 big_s(A,f5(B,A)) # label(x2138) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.43/0.99  4 big_f(A,f1(A)) # label(x2138) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.43/0.99  5 big_f(f5(A,B),f6(A,B)) # label(x2138) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.43/0.99  6 -big_d(f6(A,B),A,f4(A)) # label(x2138) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(x2138).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.43/0.99  7 -big_d(A,B,f3(C)) | -big_f(A,D) | -big_f(B,E) | big_d(D,E,C) # label(x2138) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.43/0.99  8 big_d(f5(A,f2(B)),c1,B).  [resolve(2,a,3,a)].
% 0.43/0.99  9 big_d(f6(A,f2(f3(B))),f1(c1),B).  [hyper(7,a,8,a,b,5,a,c,4,a)].
% 0.43/0.99  10 $F # answer(x2138).  [resolve(9,a,6,a)].
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  Given=5. Generated=6. Kept=6. proofs=1.
% 0.43/0.99  Usable=5. Sos=0. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=7. Hints=0.
% 0.43/0.99  Megabytes=0.04.
% 0.43/0.99  User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.43/0.99  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  Process 25178 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jul 11 13:12:08 2022
% 0.43/0.99  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------