TSTP Solution File: SYN386+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SYN386+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 05:53:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 49 ( 15 ~; 11 |; 11 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 68 ( 6 sgn 32 !; 12 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(x2138,conjecture,
( ( ! [X1] :
? [X2] : big_f(X1,X2)
& ? [X1] :
! [X3] :
? [X4] :
! [X5] :
( big_s(X4,X5)
=> big_d(X5,X1,X3) )
& ! [X3] :
? [X6] :
! [X7,X8] :
( big_d(X7,X8,X6)
=> ! [X2,X9] :
( ( big_f(X7,X2)
& big_f(X8,X9) )
=> big_d(X2,X9,X3) ) ) )
=> ? [X2] :
! [X3] :
? [X10] :
! [X5] :
( big_s(X10,X5)
=> ! [X9] :
( big_f(X5,X9)
=> big_d(X9,X2,X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',x2138) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X1] :
? [X2] : big_f(X1,X2)
& ? [X1] :
! [X3] :
? [X4] :
! [X5] :
( big_s(X4,X5)
=> big_d(X5,X1,X3) )
& ! [X3] :
? [X6] :
! [X7,X8] :
( big_d(X7,X8,X6)
=> ! [X2,X9] :
( ( big_f(X7,X2)
& big_f(X8,X9) )
=> big_d(X2,X9,X3) ) ) )
=> ? [X2] :
! [X3] :
? [X10] :
! [X5] :
( big_s(X10,X5)
=> ! [X9] :
( big_f(X5,X9)
=> big_d(X9,X2,X3) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[x2138]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X11,X14,X16,X17,X19,X20,X21,X22,X23,X25] :
( big_f(X11,esk1_1(X11))
& ( ~ big_s(esk3_1(X14),X16)
| big_d(X16,esk2_0,X14) )
& ( ~ big_d(X19,X20,esk4_1(X17))
| ~ big_f(X19,X21)
| ~ big_f(X20,X22)
| big_d(X21,X22,X17) )
& big_s(X25,esk6_2(X23,X25))
& big_f(esk6_2(X23,X25),esk7_2(X23,X25))
& ~ big_d(esk7_2(X23,X25),X23,esk5_1(X23)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( big_d(X1,esk2_0,X2)
| ~ big_s(esk3_1(X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
big_s(X1,esk6_2(X2,X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( big_d(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ big_f(X4,X2)
| ~ big_f(X5,X1)
| ~ big_d(X5,X4,esk4_1(X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
big_d(esk6_2(X1,esk3_1(X2)),esk2_0,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( big_d(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ big_f(esk6_2(X4,esk3_1(esk4_1(X3))),X1)
| ~ big_f(esk2_0,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
big_f(esk6_2(X1,X2),esk7_2(X1,X2)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ big_d(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1,esk5_1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( big_d(esk7_2(X1,esk3_1(esk4_1(X2))),X3,X2)
| ~ big_f(esk2_0,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ big_f(esk2_0,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
big_f(X1,esk1_1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN386+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 13:12:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.22/1.40
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object conjectures : 14
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object clause conjectures : 11
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object initial formulas used : 1
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.40 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.22/1.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Initial clauses : 6
% 0.22/1.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.22/1.40 # Processed clauses : 11
% 0.22/1.40 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 0.22/1.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Generated clauses : 8
% 0.22/1.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 7
% 0.22/1.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Paramodulations : 8
% 0.22/1.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.22/1.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.22/1.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.22/1.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.22/1.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 8
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.22/1.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 721
% 0.22/1.40
% 0.22/1.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.40 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.22/1.40 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/1.40 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.22/1.40 # Maximum resident set size: 2764 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------