TSTP Solution File: SYN386+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN386+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:45:32 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN386+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 17:13:09 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % File : SYN386+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.20/0.62 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.20/0.62 % Problem : Peter Andrews Problem X2138
% 0.20/0.62 % Version : Especial.
% 0.20/0.62 % English :
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Refs : [And86] Andrews (1986), An Introduction to Mathematical Logic
% 0.20/0.62 % : [And94] Andrews (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.62 % Source : [And94]
% 0.20/0.62 % Names : X2138 [And86]
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Status : Theorem
% 0.20/0.62 % Rating : 0.20 v8.1.0, 0.21 v7.5.0, 0.14 v7.4.0, 0.19 v7.3.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.23 v6.2.0, 0.27 v6.1.0, 0.12 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.13 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.10 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.1, 0.21 v4.0.0, 0.20 v3.7.0, 0.33 v3.5.0, 0.12 v3.4.0, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.11 v3.2.0, 0.22 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.20/0.62 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 1 ( 0 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 10 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of connectives : 9 ( 0 ~; 0 |; 3 &)
% 0.20/0.62 % ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 13 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of variables : 17 ( 11 !; 6 ?)
% 0.20/0.62 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.62 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 fof(x2138,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.62 ( ( ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.62 ? [Y] : big_f(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.62 & ? [X] :
% 0.20/0.62 ! [E] :
% 0.20/0.62 ? [N] :
% 0.20/0.62 ! [W] :
% 0.20/0.62 ( big_s(N,W)
% 0.20/0.62 => big_d(W,X,E) )
% 0.20/0.62 & ! [E] :
% 0.20/0.62 ? [D] :
% 0.20/0.62 ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.62 ( big_d(A,B,D)
% 0.20/0.62 => ! [Y,Z] :
% 0.20/0.62 ( ( big_f(A,Y)
% 0.20/0.62 & big_f(B,Z) )
% 0.20/0.62 => big_d(Y,Z,E) ) ) )
% 0.20/0.62 => ? [Y] :
% 0.20/0.62 ! [E] :
% 0.20/0.62 ? [M] :
% 0.20/0.62 ! [W] :
% 0.20/0.62 ( big_s(M,W)
% 0.20/0.62 => ! [Z] :
% 0.20/0.62 ( big_f(W,Z)
% 0.20/0.62 => big_d(Z,Y,E) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.63 %ClaNum:6(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.63 %VarNum:27(SingletonVarNum:14)
% 0.20/0.63 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.20/0.63 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.63 %SharedTerms:1
% 0.20/0.63 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6
% 0.20/0.63 %singleGoalClaCount:4
% 0.20/0.63 [1]P1(x11,f1(x11))
% 0.20/0.63 [2]P3(x21,f2(x22,x21))
% 0.20/0.63 [3]P1(f2(x31,x32),f7(x31,x32))
% 0.20/0.63 [4]~P2(f7(x41,x42),x41,f3(x41))
% 0.20/0.63 [5]P2(x51,a4,x52)+~P3(f5(x52),x51)
% 0.20/0.63 [6]P2(x61,x62,x63)+~P1(x64,x62)+~P1(x65,x61)+~P2(x65,x64,f6(x63))
% 0.20/0.63 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(8,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 ($false),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,3,5,6]),
% 0.20/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------