TSTP Solution File: SYN385+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SYN385+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 23:55:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYN385+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  5 03:00:08 EDT 2022
% 0.21/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.35  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.21/0.35  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.21/0.35    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.21/0.35    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.21/0.35    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.21/0.35    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.21/0.35    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.21/0.35    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.21/0.35    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.21/0.35    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.21/0.35    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.21/0.35    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.21/0.35    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.21/0.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.39  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.39  tff(big_p_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.39     big_p: $i > $o)).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(tptp_fun_Y_0_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.39     tptp_fun_Y_0: $i > $i)).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(elem_1_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.39     elem_1: $i)).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(big_q_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.39     big_q: $i > $o)).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(1,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (^[X: $i] : refl((~(big_q(X) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(X)) | (~big_p(X)))) <=> (~(big_q(X) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(X)) | (~big_p(X)))))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(2,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (![X: $i] : (~(big_q(X) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(X)) | (~big_p(X)))) <=> ![X: $i] : (~(big_q(X) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(X)) | (~big_p(X))))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[1])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(3,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | big_p(Y) | (~big_p(X)))) <=> (~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | big_p(Y) | (~big_p(X))))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(4,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_p(X) => (big_q(X) | big_p(Y)))) <=> (~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | big_p(Y) | (~big_p(X))))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(5,axiom,(~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_p(X) => (big_q(X) | big_p(Y)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','x2137')).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(6,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | big_p(Y) | (~big_p(X)))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[5, 4])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(7,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | big_p(Y) | (~big_p(X)))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6, 3])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(8,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | big_p(Y) | (~big_p(X)))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 3])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(9,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | big_p(Y) | (~big_p(X)))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 3])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(10,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | big_p(Y) | (~big_p(X)))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 3])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(11,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | big_p(Y) | (~big_p(X)))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[10, 3])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(12,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | big_p(Y) | (~big_p(X)))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[11, 3])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(13,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (^[X: $i] : sk($oeq((~![Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | big_p(Y) | (~big_p(X)))), (~(big_q(X) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(X)) | (~big_p(X))))))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(14,plain,(
% 0.21/0.39      ![X: $i] : (~(big_q(X) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(X)) | (~big_p(X))))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(nnf-neg,[status(sab)],[12, 13])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(15,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (![X: $i] : (~(big_q(X) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(X)) | (~big_p(X))))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[14, 2])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(16,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~![X: $i] : (~(big_q(X) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(X)) | (~big_p(X))))) | (~(big_q(elem!1) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1)) | (~big_p(elem!1))))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(17,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~(big_q(elem!1) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1)) | (~big_p(elem!1)))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[16, 15])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(18,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((big_q(elem!1) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1)) | (~big_p(elem!1))) | (~big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1)))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(19,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[18, 17])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(20,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((big_q(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1)) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1))) | (~big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1)))) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(21,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (big_q(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1)) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1))) | (~big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1)))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[20, 19])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(22,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~![X: $i] : (~(big_q(X) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(X)) | (~big_p(X))))) | (~(big_q(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1)) | big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1))) | (~big_p(tptp_fun_Y_0(elem!1)))))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(23,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ($false),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[22, 15, 21])).
% 0.21/0.39  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------