TSTP Solution File: SYN385+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYN385+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:10:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 12 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 10 ( 4 ~; 2 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 1 sgn 4 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(x2137,conjecture,
? [X1] :
! [X2] :
( big_p(X1)
=> ( big_q(X1)
| big_p(X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x2137) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
! [X2] :
( big_p(X1)
=> ( big_q(X1)
| big_p(X2) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[x2137]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X3,X4] :
( big_p(X3)
& ~ big_q(X4)
& ~ big_p(esk1_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ big_p(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
big_p(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN385+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 00:13:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.13/0.36 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.13/0.36 #
% 0.13/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 # Proof found!
% 0.13/0.36 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.36 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.36 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------