%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SYN380+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:51:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.80s 2.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   4 unt;   2 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_r(X1,X2)
    | ~ big_q(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lhlb8s5k/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_r(X1,X2)
    | big_q(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lhlb8s5k/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_r(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lhlb8s5k/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_r(X1,X2)
    | ~ big_q(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_r(X1,X2)
    | big_q(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_r(X1,X1),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    big_r(X1,X2),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : SYN380+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:30:32 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.80/2.29  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.80/2.29  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.80/2.29  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.80/2.29  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___042_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 7.80/2.29  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 7.80/2.29  #
% 7.80/2.29  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.80/2.29  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.80/2.29  
% 7.80/2.29  # Proof found!
% 7.80/2.29  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.80/2.29  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.80/2.29  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.80/2.29  
% 7.80/2.29  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.80/2.29  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 7.80/2.29  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 7.80/2.29  # Total time               : 0.029 s
% 7.80/2.29  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.80/2.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------