TSTP Solution File: SYN379+1 by Goeland---1.0.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem : SYN379+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:23:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.35s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN379+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 5 02:51:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.12/0.34 [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.12/0.34 [0.000037s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 Start search
% 0.12/0.35 nb_step : 1 - limit : 4
% 0.12/0.35 Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 [0] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~(! [X3_3] : (big_p(X3_3)) => ? [Y4_4] : ((! [X5_5, Z6_6] : (big_q(X5_5, Y4_4, Z6_6)) => ~! [Z7_7] : ((big_p(Z7_7) & ~big_q(Y4_4, Y4_4, Z7_7))))))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [1] ! [X3_3] : (big_p(X3_3)), ~? [Y4_4] : ((! [X5_5, Z6_6] : (big_q(X5_5, Y4_4, Z6_6)) => ~! [Z7_7] : ((big_p(Z7_7) & ~big_q(Y4_4, Y4_4, Z7_7)))))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [1] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X3_3] : (big_p(X3_3))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [2] big_p(X3_0_0)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [2] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [Y4_4] : ((! [X5_5, Z6_6] : (big_q(X5_5, Y4_4, Z6_6)) => ~! [Z7_7] : ((big_p(Z7_7) & ~big_q(Y4_4, Y4_4, Z7_7)))))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [3] ~(! [X5_5, Z6_6] : (big_q(X5_5, Y4_0_1, Z6_6)) => ~! [Z7_7] : ((big_p(Z7_7) & ~big_q(Y4_0_1, Y4_0_1, Z7_7))))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [3] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~(! [X5_5, Z6_6] : (big_q(X5_5, Y4_0_1, Z6_6)) => ~! [Z7_7] : ((big_p(Z7_7) & ~big_q(Y4_0_1, Y4_0_1, Z7_7))))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [4] ! [X5_5, Z6_6] : (big_q(X5_5, Y4_0_1, Z6_6)), ~~! [Z7_7] : ((big_p(Z7_7) & ~big_q(Y4_0_1, Y4_0_1, Z7_7)))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [4] ALPHA_NOT_NOT : ~~! [Z7_7] : ((big_p(Z7_7) & ~big_q(Y4_0_1, Y4_0_1, Z7_7)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [5] ! [Z7_7] : ((big_p(Z7_7) & ~big_q(Y4_0_1, Y4_0_1, Z7_7)))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [5] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X5_5, Z6_6] : (big_q(X5_5, Y4_0_1, Z6_6))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [6] big_q(X5_0_2, Y4_0_1, Z6_0_2)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [6] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [Z7_7] : ((big_p(Z7_7) & ~big_q(Y4_0_1, Y4_0_1, Z7_7)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [7] (big_p(Z7_0_3) & ~big_q(Y4_0_1, Y4_0_1, Z7_0_3))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [7] ALPHA_AND : (big_p(Z7_0_3) & ~big_q(Y4_0_1, Y4_0_1, Z7_0_3))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [8] big_p(Z7_0_3), ~big_q(Y4_0_1, Y4_0_1, Z7_0_3)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [8] CLOSURE : ~big_q(Y4_0_1, Y4_0_1, Z7_0_3)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 [0.007606s][1][Res] 7 goroutines created
% 0.12/0.35 ==== Result ====
% 0.12/0.35 [0.007637s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------