TSTP Solution File: SYN376+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SYN376+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 23:55:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SYN376+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  5 03:08:01 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.13/0.35  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.13/0.35    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.13/0.35    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.13/0.35    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.13/0.35    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.13/0.35    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.13/0.35    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.13/0.35    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.13/0.35    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.13/0.35    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.21/0.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.39  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.39  tff(big_p_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.39     big_p: $i > $o)).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(tptp_fun_X_2_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.39     tptp_fun_X_2: $i)).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(tptp_fun_X_1_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.39     tptp_fun_X_1: $i)).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(tptp_fun_X_0_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.39     tptp_fun_X_0: $i)).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(1,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (^[Y: $i] : refl((big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X!2)) <=> (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X!2)))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(2,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X!2)) <=> ![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X!2))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[1])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(3,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X)) <=> ?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(4,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~(?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X)) => (![X: $i] : big_p(X) | ![X: $i] : (~big_p(X))))) <=> (~(![X: $i] : big_p(X) | ![X: $i] : (~big_p(X)) | (~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X)))))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(5,axiom,(~(?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X)) => (![X: $i] : big_p(X) | ![X: $i] : (~big_p(X))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','x2127')).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(6,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~(![X: $i] : big_p(X) | ![X: $i] : (~big_p(X)) | (~?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X))))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[5, 4])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(7,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(8,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (?[X: $i] : ![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 3])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(9,plain,(
% 0.21/0.39      $oeq(![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X!2)), ![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X!2)))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(transitivity,[status(sab)],[8])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(10,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X!2))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 2])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(11,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X!2))) | (big_p(X!1) <=> big_p(X!2))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(12,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (big_p(X!1) <=> big_p(X!2)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[11, 10])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(13,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~![Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) <=> big_p(X!2))) | (big_p(X!0) <=> big_p(X!2))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(14,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (big_p(X!0) <=> big_p(X!2)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[13, 10])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(15,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~![X: $i] : big_p(X)) <=> (~![X: $i] : big_p(X))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(16,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : big_p(X)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(17,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : big_p(X)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[16, 15])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(18,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : big_p(X)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[17, 15])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(19,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : big_p(X)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[18, 15])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(20,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : big_p(X)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[19, 15])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(21,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : big_p(X)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[20, 15])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(22,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : big_p(X)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[21, 15])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(23,plain,(
% 0.21/0.39      ~big_p(X!0)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[22])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(24,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~(big_p(X!0) <=> big_p(X!2))) | big_p(X!0) | (~big_p(X!2))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(25,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~(big_p(X!0) <=> big_p(X!2))) | (~big_p(X!2))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[24, 23])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(26,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~big_p(X!2)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[25, 14])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(27,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~(~big_p(X!1))) <=> big_p(X!1)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(28,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~![X: $i] : (~big_p(X))) <=> (~![X: $i] : (~big_p(X)))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(29,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : (~big_p(X))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(30,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : (~big_p(X))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[29, 28])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(31,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : (~big_p(X))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[30, 28])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(32,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : (~big_p(X))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[31, 28])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(33,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : (~big_p(X))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[32, 28])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(34,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : (~big_p(X))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[33, 28])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(35,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![X: $i] : (~big_p(X))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[34, 28])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(36,plain,(
% 0.21/0.39      ~(~big_p(X!1))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[35])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(37,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (big_p(X!1)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[36, 27])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(38,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~(big_p(X!1) <=> big_p(X!2))) | (~big_p(X!1)) | big_p(X!2)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(39,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~(big_p(X!1) <=> big_p(X!2))) | big_p(X!2)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[38, 37])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(40,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ($false),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[39, 26, 12])).
% 0.21/0.39  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------