TSTP Solution File: SYN376+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYN376+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 04:34:11 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.73s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   77 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   84 (  34   ~;  21   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   8 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (  22   !;  18   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f32,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f23,f27,f29,f31]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ~ spl3_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f22,f14]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ~ big_p(sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ( big_p(sK0)
    & ~ big_p(sK1)
    & ! [X3] :
        ( ( big_p(X3)
          | ~ big_p(sK2) )
        & ( big_p(sK2)
          | ~ big_p(X3) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f10,f9,f8]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : big_p(X0)
   => big_p(sK0) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X1] : ~ big_p(X1)
   => ~ big_p(sK1) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
      ! [X3] :
        ( ( big_p(X3)
          | ~ big_p(X2) )
        & ( big_p(X2)
          | ~ big_p(X3) ) )
   => ! [X3] :
        ( ( big_p(X3)
          | ~ big_p(sK2) )
        & ( big_p(sK2)
          | ~ big_p(X3) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : big_p(X0)
    & ? [X1] : ~ big_p(X1)
    & ? [X2] :
      ! [X3] :
        ( ( big_p(X3)
          | ~ big_p(X2) )
        & ( big_p(X2)
          | ~ big_p(X3) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X2] : big_p(X2)
    & ? [X3] : ~ big_p(X3)
    & ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( ( big_p(X1)
          | ~ big_p(X0) )
        & ( big_p(X0)
          | ~ big_p(X1) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ? [X2] : big_p(X2)
    & ? [X3] : ~ big_p(X3)
    & ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( big_p(X1)
      <=> big_p(X0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ? [X2] : big_p(X2)
    & ? [X3] : ~ big_p(X3)
    & ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( big_p(X1)
      <=> big_p(X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ? [X0] :
        ! [X1] :
          ( big_p(X1)
        <=> big_p(X0) )
     => ( ! [X2] : ~ big_p(X2)
        | ! [X3] : big_p(X3) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [X0] :
        ! [X1] :
          ( big_p(X1)
        <=> big_p(X0) )
     => ( ! [X0] : ~ big_p(X0)
        | ! [X0] : big_p(X0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( big_p(X1)
      <=> big_p(X0) )
   => ( ! [X0] : ~ big_p(X0)
      | ! [X0] : big_p(X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oEnC0i2lVF/Vampire---4.8_21022',x2127) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ( ! [X3] : big_p(X3)
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ! [X3] : big_p(X3) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ~ spl3_3,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f26,f15]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    big_p(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ( ! [X3] : ~ big_p(X3)
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> ! [X3] : ~ big_p(X3) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ( spl3_3
    | spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f12,f17,f25]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> big_p(sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( big_p(sK2)
      | ~ big_p(X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f13,f21,f17]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( big_p(X3)
      | ~ big_p(sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SYN376+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 17:57:44 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.35  This is a FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ problem
% 0.20/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oEnC0i2lVF/Vampire---4.8_21022
% 0.56/0.73  % (21211)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.56/0.73  % (21216)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.56/0.73  % (21216)First to succeed.
% 0.56/0.73  % (21211)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.73  % (21209)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.73  % (21210)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.56/0.73  % (21213)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.73  % (21214)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.56/0.73  % (21212)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.56/0.73  % (21216)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.56/0.73  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.56/0.73  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.73  % (21216)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.73  % (21216)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.73  % (21216)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.56/0.73  
% 0.56/0.73  % (21216)Memory used [KB]: 968
% 0.56/0.73  % (21216)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.56/0.73  % (21216)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.56/0.73  % (21216)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.73  % (21216)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.73  % (21158)Success in time 0.373 s
% 0.56/0.73  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------