TSTP Solution File: SYN376+1 by Goeland---1.0.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem : SYN376+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:23:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.35s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN376+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 5 02:58:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.12/0.34 [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.12/0.34 [0.000040s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 Start search
% 0.12/0.35 nb_step : 1 - limit : 4
% 0.12/0.35 Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 [0] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~(? [X2_2] : (! [Y3_3] : ((big_p(Y3_3) <=> big_p(X2_2)))) => (! [X4_4] : (big_p(X4_4)) | ! [X5_5] : (~big_p(X5_5))))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [1] ? [X2_2] : (! [Y3_3] : ((big_p(Y3_3) <=> big_p(X2_2)))), ~(! [X4_4] : (big_p(X4_4)) | ! [X5_5] : (~big_p(X5_5)))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [1] ALPHA_NOT_OR : ~(! [X4_4] : (big_p(X4_4)) | ! [X5_5] : (~big_p(X5_5)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [2] ~! [X4_4] : (big_p(X4_4)), ~! [X5_5] : (~big_p(X5_5))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [2] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [X2_2] : (! [Y3_3] : ((big_p(Y3_3) <=> big_p(X2_2))))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [3] ! [Y3_3] : ((big_p(Y3_3) <=> big_p(skolem_X22)))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [3] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [X4_4] : (big_p(X4_4))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [4] ~big_p(skolem_X44)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [4] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [X5_5] : (~big_p(X5_5))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [5] ~~big_p(skolem_X55)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [5] ALPHA_NOT_NOT : ~~big_p(skolem_X55)
% 0.12/0.35 -> [6] big_p(skolem_X55)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [6] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [Y3_3] : ((big_p(Y3_3) <=> big_p(skolem_X22)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [7] (big_p(skolem_X55) <=> big_p(skolem_X22))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [7] BETA_EQUIV : (big_p(skolem_X55) <=> big_p(skolem_X22))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [8] ~big_p(skolem_X55), ~big_p(skolem_X22)
% 0.12/0.35 -> [9] big_p(skolem_X55), big_p(skolem_X22)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [8] CLOSURE : ~big_p(skolem_X55)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [9] : ! [Y3_3] : ((big_p(Y3_3) <=> big_p(skolem_X22)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [10] ! [Y3_3] : ((big_p(Y3_3) <=> big_p(skolem_X22)))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [10] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [Y3_3] : ((big_p(Y3_3) <=> big_p(skolem_X22)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [11] (big_p(skolem_X44) <=> big_p(skolem_X22))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [11] BETA_EQUIV : (big_p(skolem_X44) <=> big_p(skolem_X22))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [12] ~big_p(skolem_X44), ~big_p(skolem_X22)
% 0.12/0.35 -> [13] big_p(skolem_X44), big_p(skolem_X22)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [13] CLOSURE : big_p(skolem_X44)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [12] CLOSURE : ~big_p(skolem_X22)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 [0.008654s][1][Res] 10 goroutines created
% 0.12/0.35 ==== Result ====
% 0.12/0.35 [0.008687s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------