TSTP Solution File: SYN374+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SYN374+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 12:09:56 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   59 (   1 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  210 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  247 (  96   ~;  99   |;  22   &)
%                                         (  22 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (  10 usr;  10 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (  49   !;  28   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f89,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f34,f38,f46,f50,f55,f60,f70,f72,f74,f76,f79,f88]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_1
    | ~ spl7_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f87]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl7_1
    | ~ spl7_6 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f86,f49]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ( ! [X3] : big_p(X3)
    | ~ spl7_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f48]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ( spl7_6
  <=> ! [X3] : big_p(X3) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_6])]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : ~ big_p(X0)
    | ~ spl7_1
    | ~ spl7_6 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f29,f49]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ big_p(sK1(X0))
        | ~ big_p(X0) )
    | ~ spl7_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( spl7_1
  <=> ! [X0] :
        ( ~ big_p(sK1(X0))
        | ~ big_p(X0) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_1])]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_3
    | ~ spl7_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl7_3
    | ~ spl7_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f77,f41]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ( ! [X3] : ~ big_p(X3)
    | ~ spl7_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ( spl7_4
  <=> ! [X3] : ~ big_p(X3) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_4])]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : big_p(X0)
    | ~ spl7_3
    | ~ spl7_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f37,f41]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( big_p(sK1(X0))
        | big_p(X0) )
    | ~ spl7_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ( spl7_3
  <=> ! [X0] :
        ( big_p(sK1(X0))
        | big_p(X0) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_3])]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_4
    | ~ spl7_8 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl7_4
    | ~ spl7_8 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f41,f59]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ( big_p(sK4)
    | ~ spl7_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f57]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ( spl7_8
  <=> big_p(sK4) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_8])]) ).

fof(f74,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_6
    | spl7_7 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f73]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl7_6
    | spl7_7 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f49,f54]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(sK3)
    | spl7_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f52]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ( spl7_7
  <=> big_p(sK3) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_7])]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_4
    | ~ spl7_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f71]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl7_4
    | ~ spl7_6 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f49,f41]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ( spl7_2
    | spl7_4
    | spl7_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f23,f48,f40,f31]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( spl7_2
  <=> sP0 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_2])]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( big_p(X6)
      | ~ big_p(X7)
      | sP0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ~ big_p(sK3)
          | ! [X1] : ~ big_p(X1) )
        & ( ! [X2] : big_p(X2)
          | big_p(sK4) ) )
      | ~ sP0 )
    & ( ( ( big_p(sK5)
          | ~ big_p(sK6) )
        & ( ! [X6] : big_p(X6)
          | ! [X7] : ~ big_p(X7) ) )
      | sP0 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK4,sK5,sK6])],[f13,f17,f16,f15,f14]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : ~ big_p(X0)
   => ~ big_p(sK3) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ( ? [X3] : big_p(X3)
   => big_p(sK4) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( ? [X4] : big_p(X4)
   => big_p(sK5) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( ? [X5] : ~ big_p(X5)
   => ~ big_p(sK6) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ? [X0] : ~ big_p(X0)
          | ! [X1] : ~ big_p(X1) )
        & ( ! [X2] : big_p(X2)
          | ? [X3] : big_p(X3) ) )
      | ~ sP0 )
    & ( ( ( ? [X4] : big_p(X4)
          | ? [X5] : ~ big_p(X5) )
        & ( ! [X6] : big_p(X6)
          | ! [X7] : ~ big_p(X7) ) )
      | sP0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ? [X3] : ~ big_p(X3)
          | ! [X2] : ~ big_p(X2) )
        & ( ! [X3] : big_p(X3)
          | ? [X2] : big_p(X2) ) )
      | ~ sP0 )
    & ( ( ( ? [X2] : big_p(X2)
          | ? [X3] : ~ big_p(X3) )
        & ( ! [X3] : big_p(X3)
          | ! [X2] : ~ big_p(X2) ) )
      | sP0 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( sP0
  <~> ( ? [X2] : big_p(X2)
    <=> ! [X3] : big_p(X3) ) ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f4,f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( sP0
  <=> ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( big_p(X0)
      <=> big_p(X1) ) ),
    introduced(predicate_definition_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP0])]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( big_p(X0)
      <=> big_p(X1) )
  <~> ( ? [X2] : big_p(X2)
    <=> ! [X3] : big_p(X3) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ? [X0] :
        ! [X1] :
          ( big_p(X0)
        <=> big_p(X1) )
    <=> ( ? [X2] : big_p(X2)
      <=> ! [X3] : big_p(X3) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [X0] :
        ! [X1] :
          ( big_p(X0)
        <=> big_p(X1) )
    <=> ( ? [X0] : big_p(X0)
      <=> ! [X1] : big_p(X1) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( big_p(X0)
      <=> big_p(X1) )
  <=> ( ? [X0] : big_p(X0)
    <=> ! [X1] : big_p(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x2125) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_2
    | spl7_8
    | spl7_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f25,f48,f57,f31]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( big_p(X2)
      | big_p(sK4)
      | ~ sP0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_2
    | spl7_4
    | ~ spl7_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f26,f52,f40,f31]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ big_p(sK3)
      | ~ big_p(X1)
      | ~ sP0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_2
    | ~ spl7_5
    | spl7_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f19,f48,f43,f31]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ( spl7_5
  <=> big_p(sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_5])]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( big_p(X3)
      | ~ big_p(sK2)
      | ~ sP0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ( ( sP0
      | ! [X0] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(sK1(X0))
            | ~ big_p(X0) )
          & ( big_p(sK1(X0))
            | big_p(X0) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X3] :
          ( ( big_p(sK2)
            | ~ big_p(X3) )
          & ( big_p(X3)
            | ~ big_p(sK2) ) )
      | ~ sP0 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2])],[f8,f10,f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(X0) )
          & ( big_p(X1)
            | big_p(X0) ) )
     => ( ( ~ big_p(sK1(X0))
          | ~ big_p(X0) )
        & ( big_p(sK1(X0))
          | big_p(X0) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
      ! [X3] :
        ( ( big_p(X2)
          | ~ big_p(X3) )
        & ( big_p(X3)
          | ~ big_p(X2) ) )
   => ! [X3] :
        ( ( big_p(sK2)
          | ~ big_p(X3) )
        & ( big_p(X3)
          | ~ big_p(sK2) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ( ( sP0
      | ! [X0] :
        ? [X1] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(X0) )
          & ( big_p(X1)
            | big_p(X0) ) ) )
    & ( ? [X2] :
        ! [X3] :
          ( ( big_p(X2)
            | ~ big_p(X3) )
          & ( big_p(X3)
            | ~ big_p(X2) ) )
      | ~ sP0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ( sP0
      | ! [X0] :
        ? [X1] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(X0) )
          & ( big_p(X1)
            | big_p(X0) ) ) )
    & ( ? [X0] :
        ! [X1] :
          ( ( big_p(X0)
            | ~ big_p(X1) )
          & ( big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(X0) ) )
      | ~ sP0 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_2
    | spl7_4
    | spl7_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f20,f43,f40,f31]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( big_p(sK2)
      | ~ big_p(X3)
      | ~ sP0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ( spl7_3
    | spl7_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f21,f31,f36]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sP0
      | big_p(sK1(X0))
      | big_p(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ( spl7_1
    | spl7_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f22,f31,f28]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sP0
      | ~ big_p(sK1(X0))
      | ~ big_p(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14  % Problem    : SYN374+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.13/0.16  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.38  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.38  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.38  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.38  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 17:16:08 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.38  % (21386)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.16/0.40  % (21392)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.40  % (21389)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.40  % (21392)First to succeed.
% 0.16/0.40  % (21388)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.40  % (21392)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-21386"
% 0.16/0.40  % (21391)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.40  % (21393)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.40  % (21389)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.16/0.40  TRYING [1]
% 0.16/0.40  % (21392)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.16/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.40  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.40  % (21392)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.40  % (21392)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.16/0.40  % (21392)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.16/0.40  
% 0.16/0.40  % (21392)Memory used [KB]: 760
% 0.16/0.40  % (21392)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.40  % (21392)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.16/0.40  % (21386)Success in time 0.017 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------