TSTP Solution File: SYN372+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : SYN372+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 03:27:24 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 2.88s 1.11s
% Output : Proof 3.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN372+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 18:59:23 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.57 ________ _____
% 0.19/0.57 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.19/0.57 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.19/0.57 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.19/0.57 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.19/0.57 (2023-06-19)
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.19/0.57 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.19/0.57 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.19/0.57 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.19/0.58 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.19/0.59 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.19/0.59 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.19/0.59 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.19/0.59 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.19/0.59 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.19/0.59 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.19/0.59 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.38/0.92 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 1.38/0.92 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 1.97/0.96 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 1.97/0.96 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 1.97/0.96 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 1.97/0.96 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.97/0.96 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.30/1.03 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.30/1.03 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.30/1.03 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.30/1.03 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 2.30/1.03 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 2.30/1.03 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 2.30/1.03 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 2.88/1.11 Prover 3: proved (519ms)
% 2.88/1.11
% 2.88/1.11 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.88/1.11
% 3.19/1.11 Prover 0: stopped
% 3.19/1.11 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 3.19/1.12 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 3.19/1.12 Prover 2: proved (529ms)
% 3.19/1.12
% 3.19/1.12 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.19/1.12
% 3.19/1.12 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 3.19/1.12 Prover 6: stopped
% 3.19/1.12 Prover 5: stopped
% 3.19/1.13 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 3.19/1.13 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 3.19/1.13 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.19/1.13 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 3.19/1.14 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 3.35/1.14 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 3.35/1.14 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.35/1.14 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 3.35/1.14 Prover 4: Found proof (size 9)
% 3.35/1.14 Prover 4: proved (552ms)
% 3.35/1.15 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 3.35/1.15 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.35/1.15 Prover 1: Found proof (size 11)
% 3.35/1.15 Prover 1: proved (558ms)
% 3.35/1.15 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.35/1.15 Prover 7: stopped
% 3.35/1.15 Prover 10: stopped
% 3.35/1.15 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.35/1.15 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.35/1.15 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.35/1.16 Prover 13: stopped
% 3.35/1.16 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.35/1.16 Prover 8: stopped
% 3.35/1.16 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.35/1.16 Prover 11: stopped
% 3.35/1.16
% 3.35/1.16 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.35/1.16
% 3.35/1.16 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.35/1.17 Assumptions after simplification:
% 3.35/1.17 ---------------------------------
% 3.35/1.17
% 3.35/1.17 (x2123)
% 3.35/1.21 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: any] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: any] : (big_q(v0) = v1 &
% 3.35/1.21 big_p(v2) = v3 & $i(v2) & $i(v0) & ! [v4: $i] : ! [v5: int] : (v5 = 0 | ~
% 3.35/1.21 (big_p(v4) = v5) | ~ $i(v4)) & ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (big_q(v4) = 0) | ~
% 3.35/1.21 $i(v4)) & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 3.35/1.21
% 3.35/1.21 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 3.35/1.21 ---------------------------------
% 3.35/1.21
% 3.35/1.21 Begin of proof
% 3.35/1.21 |
% 3.35/1.21 | DELTA: instantiating (x2123) with fresh symbols all_3_0, all_3_1, all_3_2,
% 3.35/1.21 | all_3_3 gives:
% 3.35/1.21 | (1) big_q(all_3_3) = all_3_2 & big_p(all_3_1) = all_3_0 & $i(all_3_1) &
% 3.35/1.21 | $i(all_3_3) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (big_p(v0) =
% 3.35/1.21 | v1) | ~ $i(v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (big_q(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0)) &
% 3.35/1.21 | ( ~ (all_3_0 = 0) | all_3_2 = 0)
% 3.35/1.21 |
% 3.35/1.21 | ALPHA: (1) implies:
% 3.35/1.22 | (2) $i(all_3_3)
% 3.35/1.22 | (3) $i(all_3_1)
% 3.35/1.22 | (4) big_p(all_3_1) = all_3_0
% 3.35/1.22 | (5) big_q(all_3_3) = all_3_2
% 3.35/1.22 | (6) ~ (all_3_0 = 0) | all_3_2 = 0
% 3.35/1.22 | (7) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (big_q(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0))
% 3.35/1.22 | (8) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (big_p(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0))
% 3.35/1.22 |
% 3.35/1.22 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_3_1, all_3_0, simplifying with (3),
% 3.35/1.22 | (4) gives:
% 3.35/1.22 | (9) all_3_0 = 0
% 3.35/1.22 |
% 3.35/1.22 | BETA: splitting (6) gives:
% 3.35/1.22 |
% 3.35/1.22 | Case 1:
% 3.35/1.22 | |
% 3.69/1.22 | | (10) ~ (all_3_0 = 0)
% 3.69/1.22 | |
% 3.69/1.22 | | REDUCE: (9), (10) imply:
% 3.69/1.22 | | (11) $false
% 3.69/1.22 | |
% 3.69/1.22 | | CLOSE: (11) is inconsistent.
% 3.69/1.22 | |
% 3.69/1.22 | Case 2:
% 3.69/1.22 | |
% 3.69/1.22 | | (12) all_3_2 = 0
% 3.69/1.22 | |
% 3.69/1.22 | | REDUCE: (5), (12) imply:
% 3.69/1.22 | | (13) big_q(all_3_3) = 0
% 3.69/1.22 | |
% 3.69/1.22 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_3_3, simplifying with (2), (13)
% 3.69/1.22 | | gives:
% 3.69/1.22 | | (14) $false
% 3.69/1.22 | |
% 3.69/1.22 | | CLOSE: (14) is inconsistent.
% 3.69/1.22 | |
% 3.69/1.22 | End of split
% 3.69/1.22 |
% 3.69/1.22 End of proof
% 3.69/1.22 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.69/1.22
% 3.69/1.22 653ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------