TSTP Solution File: SYN372+1 by Duper---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Duper---1.0
% Problem : SYN372+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : duper %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 02:11:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.39s 3.71s
% Output : Proof 3.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN372+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : duper %s
% 0.17/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 18:46:17 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 3.39/3.71 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.39/3.71 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (X : Iota), (Exists fun Y => big_p Y → big_q X) → Exists fun Y => big_p Y → big_q Y)) True
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), (Exists fun Y => big_p Y → big_q X) → Exists fun Y => big_p Y → big_q Y) False
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not ((Exists fun Y => big_p Y → big_q (skS.0 0 a)) → Exists fun Y => big_p Y → big_q Y)) True
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq ((Exists fun Y => big_p Y → big_q (skS.0 0 a)) → Exists fun Y => big_p Y → big_q Y) False
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Exists fun Y => big_p Y → big_q (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (Exists fun Y => big_p Y → big_q Y) False
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #6 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (big_p (skS.0 1 a a_1) → big_q (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (big_p (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False) (Eq (big_q (skS.0 0 a)) True)
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #8 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (big_p a → big_q a) False
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (big_p a) True
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #10 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (big_q a) False
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #11 (by superposition #[9, 7]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (big_q (skS.0 0 a)) True)
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #13 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (big_q (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #14 (by superposition #[13, 10]): Eq True False
% 3.39/3.71 Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): False
% 3.39/3.71 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------