TSTP Solution File: SYN370+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SYN370+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 01:45:28 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYN370+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 18:58:31 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.61  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.20/0.61  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.61  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61  % File     : SYN370+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.20/0.61  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.20/0.61  % Problem  : Peter Andrews Problem X2121
% 0.20/0.61  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.20/0.61  % English  :
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  % Refs     : [And86] Andrews (1986), An Introduction to Mathematical Logic
% 0.20/0.61  %          : [And94] Andrews (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.61  % Source   : [And94]
% 0.20/0.61  % Names    : X2121 [And86]
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.20/0.61  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.13 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.20/0.61  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.20/0.61  %            Number of atoms       :    3 (   0 equ)
% 0.20/0.61  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
% 0.20/0.61  %            Number of connectives :    2 (   0   ~;   1   |;   0   &)
% 0.20/0.62  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   1   !;   2   ?)
% 0.20/0.62  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  % Comments :
% 0.20/0.62  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62  fof(x2121,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.62      ? [V] :
% 0.20/0.62      ! [Y] :
% 0.20/0.62      ? [Z] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( ( big_p(a,Y,h(Y))
% 0.20/0.62          | big_p(V,Y,f(Y)) )
% 0.20/0.62       => big_p(V,Y,Z) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.62  %ClaNum:2(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.62  %VarNum:8(SingletonVarNum:3)
% 0.20/0.62  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.20/0.62  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.20/0.62  %SharedTerms:1
% 0.20/0.62  %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.20/0.62  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.62  [1]~P1(x11,f1(x11),x12)
% 0.20/0.62  [2]P1(x21,f1(x21),f3(f1(x21)))+P1(a2,f1(x21),f4(f1(x21)))
% 0.20/0.62  %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62  cnf(3,plain,
% 0.20/0.62     (P1(a2,f1(a2),f3(f1(a2)))),
% 0.20/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2])).
% 0.20/0.62  cnf(5,plain,
% 0.20/0.62     ($false),
% 0.20/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3]),
% 0.20/0.62     ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.62  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.62  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------