TSTP Solution File: SYN366+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SYN366+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:20:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.42s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
big_r(skc2,skc2),
file('SYN366+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
~ big_r(skc3,skc3),
file('SYN366+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
( ~ big_r(u,u)
| big_r(u,v) ),
file('SYN366+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(5,axiom,
( ~ big_r(u,u)
| big_r(v,u) ),
file('SYN366+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(6,axiom,
( ~ big_r(u,v)
| big_r(v,v) ),
file('SYN366+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(7,plain,
big_r(u,skc2),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,5]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,5.0')] ).
cnf(9,plain,
big_r(skc2,u),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,3]),
[iquote('0:Res:7.0,3.0')] ).
cnf(12,plain,
big_r(u,u),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[9,6]),
[iquote('0:Res:9.0,6.0')] ).
cnf(14,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[12,2]),
[iquote('0:UnC:12.0,2.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYN366+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 08:50:28 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.42 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.42 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS derived 7 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 9 clauses.
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS allocated 85067 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS spent 0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.02 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 9 :
% 0.19/0.42 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.42 Formulae used in the proof : x2117
% 0.19/0.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------