TSTP Solution File: SYN366+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SYN366+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:51:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.51s 2.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( big_r(X1,X2)
| ~ big_r(X2,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-77gn97bg/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
big_r(esk1_0,esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-77gn97bg/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( big_r(X1,X1)
| ~ big_r(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-77gn97bg/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ big_r(esk2_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-77gn97bg/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( big_r(X1,X2)
| ~ big_r(X2,X2) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
big_r(esk1_0,esk1_0),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( big_r(X1,X1)
| ~ big_r(X1,X2) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
big_r(X1,esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ big_r(esk2_0,esk2_0),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
big_r(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYN366+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 08:32:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.51/2.34 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.51/2.34 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.51/2.34 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.51/2.34 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S0V
% 7.51/2.34 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptRRHorn.
% 7.51/2.34 #
% 7.51/2.34 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 7.51/2.34
% 7.51/2.34 # Proof found!
% 7.51/2.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.51/2.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.51/2.34 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.51/2.34
% 7.51/2.34 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.51/2.34 # User time : 0.012 s
% 7.51/2.34 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.51/2.34 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 7.51/2.34 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.51/2.34
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------