TSTP Solution File: SYN361+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : SYN361+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:42:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN361+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:15:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.40  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.19/0.40  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.19/0.40  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.40  1. (-. (big_s T_0)) (big_s T_0)   ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40  2. (-. (-. (big_s T_0))) (-. (big_s T_0))   ### NotNot 1
% 0.19/0.40  3. (-. (Ex U, (-. (big_s U)))) (-. (big_s T_0))   ### NotExists 2
% 0.19/0.40  4. (-. (big_p T_1 T_0)) (big_p T_1 T_0)   ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40  5. (All X, (big_p X T_0)) (-. (big_p T_1 T_0))   ### All 4
% 0.19/0.40  6. (big_q T_1 T_0) (-. (big_q T_1 T_0))   ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40  7. ((big_p T_1 T_0) => (-. (big_q T_1 T_0))) (big_q T_1 T_0) (All X, (big_p X T_0))   ### Imply 5 6
% 0.19/0.40  8. (All Y, ((big_p T_1 Y) => (-. (big_q T_1 Y)))) (All X, (big_p X T_0)) (big_q T_1 T_0)   ### All 7
% 0.19/0.40  9. (All X, (All Y, ((big_p X Y) => (-. (big_q X Y))))) (big_q T_1 T_0) (All X, (big_p X T_0))   ### All 8
% 0.19/0.40  10. (Ex Y, (big_q Y T_0)) (All X, (big_p X T_0)) (All X, (All Y, ((big_p X Y) => (-. (big_q X Y)))))   ### Exists 9
% 0.19/0.40  11. ((big_s T_0) => (Ex Y, (big_q Y T_0))) (All X, (All Y, ((big_p X Y) => (-. (big_q X Y))))) (All X, (big_p X T_0)) (-. (Ex U, (-. (big_s U))))   ### Imply 3 10
% 0.19/0.40  12. (All X, ((big_s X) => (Ex Y, (big_q Y X)))) (-. (Ex U, (-. (big_s U)))) (All X, (big_p X T_0)) (All X, (All Y, ((big_p X Y) => (-. (big_q X Y)))))   ### All 11
% 0.19/0.40  13. (Ex V, (All X, (big_p X V))) (All X, (All Y, ((big_p X Y) => (-. (big_q X Y))))) (-. (Ex U, (-. (big_s U)))) (All X, ((big_s X) => (Ex Y, (big_q Y X))))   ### Exists 12
% 0.19/0.40  14. (-. (((Ex V, (All X, (big_p X V))) /\ ((All X, ((big_s X) => (Ex Y, (big_q Y X)))) /\ (All X, (All Y, ((big_p X Y) => (-. (big_q X Y))))))) => (Ex U, (-. (big_s U)))))   ### ConjTree 13
% 0.19/0.40  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.40  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------